How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3850 Galleria Woods Drive, Birmingham, AL 35244 (opens Google Maps) · Jefferson County · (205) 985-7537· 30 certified beds · avg 26 residents/day · certified since Feb 16, 2007 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC. (15 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Apr 11, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 17, 2018 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 17, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| May 17, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2019 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Alabama avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.74 | 4.43 | 3.95 | top 31% in Alabama; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.98 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 15% in Alabama; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.52 | 3.73 | 3.50 | top 9% in Alabama; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.85 | 0.36 | 0.48 | top 2% in Alabama; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 69.8 | 46.9 | 45.8 | bottom 5% in Alabama; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 39.5 | 42.9 | bottom 34% in Alabama; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.36, RN 0.90, weekend 4.16.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.36 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Galleria Woods Skilled Nursing Facility. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCP Ma3 GP Holding, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| HCP Ventures II TRS LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| Janus Living TRS LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| Ocean Acquisition I LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| Arc Galleria Woods INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| Arc Galleria Woods INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Blackrock INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| CCRC Propco Ventures, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| Cheng, Patrick | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
| HCP Ma3, LP | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| HCP Ma3, LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| HCP Partners LP | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| HCP Partners LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| HCP S-H 2014 Member LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| HCP Ventures II Partner LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| HCP/LS 2011 Reit, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| Healthpeak Op LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| Healthpeak Properties INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| Janus Living Op LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
| Janus Living, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2026 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Healthpeak Properties, INC. — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diversicare of Riverchase | 1.8 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| South Haven Health and Rehabilitation, LLC | 2.6 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC | 2.8 mi | Hoover, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River | 6.3 mi | Vestavia, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Brookdale University Park SNF (al) | 6.3 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Elite Nursing and Rehabilitation Care Center | 7.2 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Shelby Ridge Nursing Home | 7.9 mi | Alabaster, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Healthcare Center at Buck Creek | 8.0 mi | Alabaster, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Northgate Health and Rehabilitation Center | 8.3 mi | Bessemer, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Stonehaven Health and Rehabilitation Center | 8.3 mi | Bessemer, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oaks on Parkwood Skilled Nursing Facility | 8.6 mi | Bessemer, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Redmont Health and Rehabilitation Center | 8.8 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Jefferson, AL — 34 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015459.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details