2625 Laurel Oak Drive, Bessemer, AL 35022 (opens Google Maps) · Jefferson County · (205) 497-4520· 130 certified beds · avg 125 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1971 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: NOLAND HEALTH (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 28, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint F-0607
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Sep 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Sep 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Sep 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint · F-0740 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| May 20, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| May 20, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Jul 18, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Jul 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 19, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Jul 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Jul 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2019 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $17,345.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2025 | Fine | $17,345 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Alabama avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.60 | 4.43 | 3.95 | top 39% in Alabama; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 27% in Alabama; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.89 | 3.73 | 3.50 | top 35% in Alabama; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.48 | top 9% in Alabama; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.2 | 46.9 | 45.8 | top 38% in Alabama; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 39.5 | 42.9 | top 34% in Alabama; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.97, RN 0.73, weekend 3.35.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.97 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Oaks on Parkwood Skilled Nursing Facility. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adamson, Michele | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2017 |
| Adamson, Michele | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2017 |
| Bass, Don | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/2023 |
| Bass, Don | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/2023 |
| Bass, Don | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/2023 |
| Blackwell, Crystal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/09/2025 |
| Blackwell, Crystal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/09/2025 |
| Britton, Isaac | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2009 |
| Britton, Isaac | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2009 |
| Collier, Courtney | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/22/2023 |
| Collier, Courtney | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/22/2023 |
| Estep, Barbara | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Estep, Barbara | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Estep, Barbara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Estep, Barbara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Goff, Robert | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2009 |
| Goff, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2009 |
| Hall, Matthew | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
| Hall, Matthew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
| Hall, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
Showing 20 of 43 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 23 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Noland Health — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diversicare of Bessemer | 2.5 mi | Bessemer, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Plantation Manor Nursing Home | 4.4 mi | MC Calla, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Stonehaven Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.1 mi | Bessemer, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Northgate Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.2 mi | Bessemer, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Baron House of Hueytown | 7.2 mi | Hueytown, AL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Self Skilled Nursing & Rehab | 8.2 mi | Hueytown, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Galleria Woods Skilled Nursing Facility | 8.6 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| South Haven Health and Rehabilitation, LLC | 9.9 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Redmont Health and Rehabilitation Center | 9.9 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Healthcare Center at Buck Creek | 9.9 mi | Alabaster, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC | 10.0 mi | Hoover, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Caregivers of Pleasant Grove, INC | 10.0 mi | Pleasant Grove, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Jefferson, AL — 34 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015369.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details