Autumn Lake Healthcare at Alice Manor

2095 Rockrose Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21211 (opens Google Maps) · Baltimore City County · (410) 889-9700· 105 certified beds · avg 99 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE (59 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected May 1, 2025

Serious findings on record

most recent Nov 20, 2024

Fines, last 3 years

3.07

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 20, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Mar 15, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 55 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Apr 17, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint F-0585
May 1, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
May 1, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

View all 55 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 17, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585
May 1, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725
May 1, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · F-0728
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726
Nov 20, 2024	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760
Nov 20, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
Nov 20, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Nov 20, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint · F-0742
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint · F-0758
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · from a complaint · F-0773
Jun 14, 2021	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Jun 14, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Jun 14, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622
Jun 14, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · F-0624
Jun 14, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jun 14, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Jun 14, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804
Jun 14, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Jun 14, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways. · F-0924
Jun 14, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · F-0943
Jun 14, 2021	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · F-0559
Jun 14, 2021	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Jun 14, 2021	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Jun 14, 2021	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732
Sep 12, 2018	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Sep 12, 2018	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Sep 12, 2018	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583
Sep 12, 2018	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Sep 12, 2018	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (23 → 11).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2018

2021

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2018	5	0	E
2021	23	0	F
2024	14	1	G ▲
2025	12	0	E
2026	1	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityMaryland averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.07

3.83

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.11

0.83

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.80

3.43

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.07	3.83	3.95	bottom 11% in Maryland; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.11	0.83	0.69	bottom 1% in Maryland; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.80	3.43	3.50	bottom 14% in Maryland; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.12	0.63	0.48	bottom 1% in Maryland; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	69.7	40.2	45.8	bottom 1% in Maryland; bottom 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	50.0	38.7	42.9	bottom 26% in Maryland; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.18, RN 0.11, weekend 2.90.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.18 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Autumn Lake Healthcare at Alice Manor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Alice Parent LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	09/01/2014
Accurate Staffing LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2014
Accurate Staffing LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/19/2025
Alice Building II, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Mortgage Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2014
Alice Building II, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2014
Brand Sonnenschine LLP	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2014
Brand Sonnenschine LLP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/25/2025
Rizqui, Ibrahim	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2021
Schwartz, Mark	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2025
Schwartz, Mark	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2014
Serasky Price, Sholom Leib	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/15/2021
Serasky Price, Sholom Leib	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/15/2021
Stern, Aryeh	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2014

All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Autumn Lake Healthcare — 59 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arcola — Silver Spring, MD · overall 4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arlington West — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Ballenger Creek — Frederick, MD · overall 2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Baltimore Washington — Glen Burnie, MD · overall 2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Birch Manor — Sykesville, MD · overall 4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Braddock Heights — Frederick, MD · overall 4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bradford Oaks — Clinton, MD · overall 4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bridgepark — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 58 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
"Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
"What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
"What training and competency checks do your nurse aides go through, and how do you keep their skills current?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Maryland midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 70% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 83 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Roland Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	1.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★☆☆	2/5
Northwest Healthcare Center	1.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Keswick Multi-Care Center	1.2 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Levindale Hebrew Ger Ctr & HSP	1.6 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Blue Point Healthcare Center	1.6 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★☆☆	2/5
Future Care Sandtown-Winchester	1.8 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arlington West	1.8 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bridgepark	2.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Future Care Homewood	2.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Future Care Charles Village	2.1 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
The Nursing and Rehab Center at Stadium Place	2.6 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Maryland Baptist Aged Home	2.7 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Baltimore City, MD — 27 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Autumn Lake Healthcare at Homewood — Baltimore, MD · overall 1/5abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Long Green — Baltimore, MD · overall 1/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Overlea — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care Center — Baltimore, MD · overall 3/5
Carroll Park Healthcare — Baltimore, MD · overall —/5abuseSFF

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Baltimore →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215215.