How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Fountainbleau Nursing Center
1349 Highway 61, Festus, MO 63028 (opens Google Maps) · Jefferson County · (636) 937-3500· 116 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Dec 16, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SHAFIQ MALIK (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 12, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. F-0600
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Sep 27, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Sep 27, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Sep 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Jun 9, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. · F-0570 |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.51
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.43
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.04
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.51 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 13% in Missouri; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 48% in Missouri; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.04 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 10% in Missouri; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.48 | bottom 43% in Missouri; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.1 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 21% in Missouri; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 12.5 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 7% in Missouri; top 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.66, RN 0.45, weekend 2.17.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.66 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Fountainbleau Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chaudhry, Bilkess | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 09/29/1989 |
| Malik, Ali | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 09/29/1989 |
| Malik, Muhammad Tariq | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 09/29/1989 |
| Naeem, Tahira | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 09/29/1989 |
| Dooley, Billy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2024 |
| Dooley, Billy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2024 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2020 |
| Habibullah, Ayaaz | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Habibullah, Ayaaz | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/10/2025 |
| Malik, Ali | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/1989 |
| Malik, Muhammad Tariq | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/1989 |
| Malik, Shafiq | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/1989 |
| Malik, Shafiq | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2018 |
| Malik, Shafiq | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2018 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Shafiq Malik — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Lutheran Nursing Home — Concordia, MO · overall 4/5
- Riverview at the Park Care and Rehabilitation Cent — Sainte Genevieve, MO · overall 4/5
- St Joe Manor — Bonne Terre, MO · overall 1/5
- St Louis Altenheim — Saint Louis, MO · overall —/5
- Beautiful Savior Home — Belton, MO · overall 3/5
- Community Manor — Farmington, MO · overall 3/5
- Crystal Oaks — Festus, MO · overall 4/5
- Fountainbleau Lodge — Cape Girardeau, MO · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "What specific training do your nurse aides complete in dementia care and abuse prevention, and how often is it refreshed?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Missouri midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 13 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crystal Oaks | 0.3 mi | Festus, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Superior Manor of Festus, LLC | 1.4 mi | Festus, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Scenic Wellness and Rehabilitation Center | 4.0 mi | Herculaneum, MO | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Hillcrest Care Center INC | 9.7 mi | De Soto, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Baisch Nursing Center | 9.7 mi | De Soto, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Stonebridge Desoto | 11.9 mi | De Soto, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Woodland Manor Nursing Center | 16.6 mi | Arnold, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Accolade Healthcare of Waterloo | 17.5 mi | Waterloo, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation | 17.6 mi | Cedar Hill, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| South County Health Care Center | 18.2 mi | Arnold, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Bethesda Southgate | 18.7 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Nexus at Columbia | 19.4 mi | Columbia, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Jefferson, MO — 11 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Maple Grove Wellness & Rehabilitation — Fenton, MO · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265654.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).