MissouriDe Soto

Hillcrest Care Center INC

1108 Clarke Street, De Soto, MO 63020 · Jefferson County · 120 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Jul 10, 1995

Part of chain: JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN (56 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$10,845
Fines, last 3 years
3.88
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 8, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 1, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 22, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Aug 8, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Aug 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Aug 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Aug 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
202471J ▲
202510E
202660F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,845.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 8, 2024Fine$10,845

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.883.663.95top 38% in Missouri; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.490.69top 43% in Missouri; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.233.223.50top 46% in Missouri; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.440.330.48top 15% in Missouri; top 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.856.045.8top 25% in Missouri; bottom 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.347.842.9top 7% in Missouri; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 0.39, weekend 2.74. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lincoln, JamesIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%04/01/2002
Lincoln, JudyIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%04/02/2002
Crane, GaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2002
Drake, TimothyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2002
Stutts, CharlotteIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2002
Tindall, CindyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Stonebridge Desoto4.2 miDe Soto, MO★★★★☆4/5
Baisch Nursing Center6.5 miDe Soto, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Superior Manor of Festus, LLC8.8 miFestus, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Crystal Oaks9.6 miFestus, MO★★★★☆4/5
Fountainbleau Nursing Center9.7 miFestus, MO★★★★☆4/5
Scenic Wellness and Rehabilitation Center11.5 miHerculaneum, MO★★★★☆5/5
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation15.0 miCedar Hill, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
St Joe Manor16.3 miBonne Terre, MO★☆☆☆☆3/5
Gardens Health and Rehab, the19.3 miPotosi, MO★☆☆☆☆3/5
Potosi Manor19.9 miPotosi, MO★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in De Soto →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265620.