How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Edenbrook at Hampton
1548 Sans Souci Parkway, Wilkes Barre, PA 18702 (opens Google Maps) · Luzerne County · (570) 825-8725· 104 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Oct 17, 1968 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EDEN SENIOR CARE (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 10, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 36 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. F-0559
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
View all 36 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · F-0559 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · F-0745 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · from a complaint · F-0576 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough staff with the right skills to meet the mental and behavioral health needs of its residents, such as those living with dementia or depression. · from a complaint · F-0741 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint · F-0745 |
| Jul 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint · F-0908 |
| Feb 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Feb 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · from a complaint · F-0565 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 19
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 19 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.86
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.46
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.66
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.86 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 42% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.46 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 20% in Pennsylvania; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.66 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 24% in Pennsylvania; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 58.3 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 15% in Pennsylvania; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 38.5 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 49% in Pennsylvania; top 44% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.43, weekend 3.39.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Edenbrook at Hampton. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pa 6 Investors, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/01/2025 |
| Byron, Ellen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Byron, Ellen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Hampton SNF Realty, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Hampton SNF Realty, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Lifsics, Channie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Mauer, Dovie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Mittal, Basant | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Mittal, Basant | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Pa 6 Investors, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Polstein, Mordechai | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Polstein, Mordechai | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Polstein, Mordechai | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2024 |
| Stesel, Maxim | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Stesel, Maxim | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2024 |
| Stesel, Maxim | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2024 |
| Zarkh, Gleb | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2024 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Eden Senior Care — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Edenbrook North — Williamsport, PA · overall 2/5
- Edenbrook of Yeadon — Yeadon, PA · overall 2/5abuse
- Edenbrook on Second Ave — Kingston, PA · overall 1/5
- Edenbrook Lakeside — Milwaukee, WI · overall 1/5
- Edenbrook of Appleton North — Appleton, WI · overall 2/5
- Edenbrook of Fond Du Lac — Fond Du Lac, WI · overall 4/5
- Edenbrook of Green Bay — Green Bay, WI · overall 3/5
- Edenbrook of Oshkosh — Oshkosh, WI · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you handle room assignments and roommate requests, and do residents get advance written notice before any move?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 58% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 27 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birchwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 2.9 mi | Nanticoke, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Allied Services Meade Street Skilled Nursing | 3.5 mi | Wilkes Barre, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Allied Services Center City Skilled Nursing | 3.5 mi | Wilkes Barre, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Embassy of Wyoming Valley | 3.8 mi | Wilkes Barre, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Edenbrook on Second Ave | 3.9 mi | Kingston, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lakewood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 4.3 mi | Nanticoke, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Riverstreet Manor | 4.5 mi | Wilkes-Barre, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Third Avenue Health & Rehab Center | 4.5 mi | Kingston, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maple Ridge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 4.5 mi | Kingston, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heinz Transitional Rehabilitation Unit | 5.0 mi | Wilkes-Barre, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mountain Top Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 5.4 mi | Mountain Top, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.9 mi | Dallas, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Luzerne, PA — 22 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Embassy of East Mountain — Wilkes-Barre, PA · overall 1/5
- Highland Manor Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Exeter, PA · overall 2/5
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Lakeside — Dallas, PA · overall 2/5
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Luzerne — Drums, PA · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395249.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).