Edenbrook of Fond Du Lac
265 S National Ave, Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 · Fond Du Lac County · 90 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1976
Part of chain: EDEN SENIOR CARE (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 11, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: May 20, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (14)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint |
| Mar 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| May 15, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| May 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| May 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| May 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 6 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $9,113.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2025 | Fine | $9,113 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Wisconsin avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.96 | 4.29 | 3.95 | bottom 4% in Wisconsin; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.82 | 1.01 | 0.69 | bottom 35% in Wisconsin; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.70 | 3.84 | 3.50 | bottom 7% in Wisconsin; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.48 | top 47% in Wisconsin; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.4 | 46.9 | 45.8 | bottom 36% in Wisconsin; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 39.7 | 42.9 | top 24% in Wisconsin; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.28, RN 0.91, weekend 3.00. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lifsics, Channie | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 11/01/2018 |
| Polstein, Mordechai | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 18% | 11/01/2018 |
| Seyler, Miriah | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| Stesel, Maxim | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 49% | 11/01/2018 |
| Weber, Lisa | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| Polstein, Mordechai | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| Rice, Pamela | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Seyler, Miriah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2025 |
| Weber, Lisa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harbor Haven Health & Rehabilitation | 0.5 mi | Fond Du Lac, WI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Avina on Division | 0.6 mi | Fond Du Lac, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Francis Home | 0.8 mi | Fond Du Lac, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avina of Fond Du Lac | 1.5 mi | Fond Du Lac, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fond Du Lac Lutheran Home | 1.7 mi | Fond Du Lac, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hope Health and Rehab | 12.7 mi | Lomira, WI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bethel Home | 18.8 mi | Oshkosh, WI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Edenbrook of Oshkosh | 19.3 mi | Oshkosh, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Christian Home LLC | 19.4 mi | Waupun, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Evergreen Health Center | 19.5 mi | Oshkosh, WI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Fond Du Lac →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525274.