How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
640 Jackson Street, Saint Paul, MN 55101 (opens Google Maps) · Ramsey County · (651) 254-0400· 32 certified beds · avg 29 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1989 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 7 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 6.47 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 5% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 2.26 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 4% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 6.10 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 3% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 2.17 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 1% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 24.2 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 9% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 40% in Minnesota; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.76, RN 2.36, weekend 6.37.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.76 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Capital View Transitional Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clark, John | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Clark, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/14/2022 |
| Hpi Ramsey | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2001 |
| Mangan, Michelle | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2010 |
| McClure, Nance | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/18/2001 |
| Myster, Jennifer | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Remark, Megan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Vonsternberg, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/23/2002 |
All 8 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebenezer Integrated Care & Rehab | 0.5 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Villas at St Paul | 0.7 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Little Sisters of the Poor | 1.1 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Emeralds at St Paul LLC | 1.2 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cerenity Care Center on Humboldt | 1.8 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cerenity Marian of St Paul LLC | 2.0 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Society - Maplewood | 3.2 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East | 3.2 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lyngblomsten Care Center | 3.5 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Walker Methodist Westwood Ridge II | 3.8 mi | West Saint Paul, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hayes Residence | 4.0 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota | 4.1 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Ramsey, MN — 28 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245534.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details