How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
East Neck Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
134 Great East Neck Road, West Babylon, NY 11704 (opens Google Maps) · Suffolk County · (631) 422-4800· 300 certified beds · avg 282 residents/day · certified since Feb 15, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CASSENA CARE (13 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Nov 19, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 29 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint F-0690
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 29 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint · F-0573 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint · F-0622 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint · F-0688 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff. · from a complaint · F-0840 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, approved x-ray services or have an agreement with an approved provider to supply them. · F-0776 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain x-rays and other imaging tests when ordered, or did not promptly tell the ordering doctor the results. · F-0777 |
| Dec 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.67
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.90
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.42
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.67 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 7% in New York; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 14% in New York; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.42 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 10% in New York; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.85 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 10% in New York; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.2 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 49% in New York; top 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 39.2 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 47% in New York; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.09, RN 1.05, weekend 2.80.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.09 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for East Neck Nursing & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banger, Lisa | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 02/01/2005 |
| Carillo, Joseph | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 27% | 02/01/2005 |
| Carillo, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 02/01/2005 |
| Debenedictis, Pasquale | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 02/01/2005 |
| Ostreicher, Dvora | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 02/01/2005 |
| Solovey, Alex | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 02/01/2005 |
| Banger, Lisa | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2005 |
| Carillo, Joseph | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2005 |
| Carillo, Robert | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2005 |
| Debenedictis, Pasquale | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2005 |
| Debenedictis, Pasquale | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2005 |
| Derosa, Anthony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/06/2007 |
| Ostreicher, Dvora | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2005 |
| Solovey, Alex | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2005 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cassena Care — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Fordham Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Bronx, NY · overall 3/5
- Long Beach Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Long Beach, NY · overall 4/5
- Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care INC — Jamaica, NY · overall 5/5
- Morningside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Bronx, NY · overall 5/5
- Peninsula Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Far Rockaway, NY · overall 2/5
- Sea Crest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Shore View Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — New York City, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
- "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 38% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 62 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkshire Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | West Babylon, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Our Lady of Consolation Nursing and Rehabilitive C | 2.8 mi | West Islip, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Massapequa Center Rehabilitation & Nursing | 4.2 mi | Amityville, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Parkview Care and Rehabilitation Center, INC | 5.1 mi | Massapequa, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Daleview Care Center | 6.0 mi | East Farmingdale, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sunrise Manor Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio | 6.5 mi | Bay Shore, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maria Regina Rehabilitation and Nursing | 7.7 mi | Brentwood, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ross Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 8.3 mi | Brentwood, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Huntington Hills Center for Health and Rehabilitat | 8.3 mi | Melville, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Central Island Healthcare | 9.1 mi | Plainview, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing | 9.4 mi | East Islip, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Apex Rehabilitation & Care Center | 9.7 mi | Huntington Station, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Suffolk, NY — 41 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Good Samaritan Nursing and Rehabilitation Care Ctr — Sayville, NY · overall 5/5
- Gurwin Jewish Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Commack, NY · overall 5/5
- Island Nursing and Rehab Center — Holtsville, NY · overall 4/5
- Jefferson's Ferry — South Setauket, NY · overall 5/5
- John T Mather Memorial Hosp T C U — Port Jefferson, NY · overall 5/5
- Long Island State Veterans Home — Stonybrook, NY · overall 5/5
- Luxor Nursing & Rehabilitation at Mills Pond — St James, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335681.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).