111 Beach Drive, West Islip, NY 11795 (opens Google Maps) · Suffolk County · (631) 587-1600· 450 certified beds · avg 280 residents/day · certified since Jun 12, 1975 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint F-0804
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Mar 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · from a complaint · F-0710 |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Apr 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Mar 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 12).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $141,980.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | Fine | $141,980 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.58 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 41% in New York; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.06 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 9% in New York; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.26 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 34% in New York; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.83 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 11% in New York; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 27.9 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 22% in New York; top 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 24.6 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 19% in New York; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.73, RN 1.11, weekend 3.40.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.73 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Our Lady of Consolation Nursing and Rehabilitive C. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celiberti, Douglas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Christman, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Dagher, Peter | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Haight, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Hoffman, Jennifer | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Lambert, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| McCarthy, Justin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| O'Brien, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Pietrowski, Stephen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Ryan, James | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Neck Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.8 mi | West Babylon, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Berkshire Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | West Babylon, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Sunrise Manor Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio | 4.4 mi | Bay Shore, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maria Regina Rehabilitation and Nursing | 6.1 mi | Brentwood, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing | 6.8 mi | East Islip, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ross Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.8 mi | Brentwood, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Massapequa Center Rehabilitation & Nursing | 6.9 mi | Amityville, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Parkview Care and Rehabilitation Center, INC | 7.8 mi | Massapequa, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Daleview Care Center | 8.6 mi | East Farmingdale, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Gurwin Jewish Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 9.5 mi | Commack, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Huntington Hills Center for Health and Rehabilitat | 9.7 mi | Melville, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Affinity Skilled Living and Rehabilitation Center | 10.1 mi | Oakdale, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Suffolk, NY — 41 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335539.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details