How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Copper Ridge Health Care
3706 West 9000 South, West Jordan, UT 84088 (opens Google Maps) · Salt Lake County · (801) 280-2273· 120 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Feb 9, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 10, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jun 24, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.53
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 24, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 24, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 24, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has plan of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not keep complete, dated laboratory records in residents' files. F-0775
View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep complete, dated laboratory records in residents' files. · F-0775 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff. · F-0840 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough fresh-air ventilation, whether through windows, mechanical systems, or both. · F-0923 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jan 12, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways. · F-0924 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityUtah averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.53
Utah average: 3.87
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.82
Utah average: 1.17
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.88
Utah average: 3.39
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Utah avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.53 | 3.87 | 3.95 | bottom 46% in Utah; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.82 | 1.17 | 0.69 | bottom 23% in Utah; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.88 | 3.39 | 3.50 | bottom 30% in Utah; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.53 | 0.88 | 0.48 | bottom 17% in Utah; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.9 | 50.7 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in Utah; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 29.4 | 40.6 | 42.9 | top 32% in Utah; top 28% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.46, RN 0.80, weekend 2.83.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.46 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Copper Ridge Health Care. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2009 |
| Caretrust GP LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Caretrust Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Durtschi, Luke | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2023 |
| Durtschi, Luke | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2023 |
| Durtschi, Luke | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2023 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2009 |
| Gangotena-Bernard, Fatima | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/20/2024 |
| Gangotena-Bernard, Fatima | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/20/2024 |
| Gangotena-Bernard, Fatima | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/20/2024 |
| Jordan Health Associates, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Jordan Health Associates, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2025 |
| Jordan Health Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Moss, Tyler | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Coral Desert Rehabilitation and Care — St. George, UT · overall 4/5
- Draper Rehabilitation and Care Center — Draper, UT · overall 4/5
- Harrison Pointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation — Ogden, UT · overall 4/5
- Heritage Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation — Roy, UT · overall 3/5abuse
- Holladay Healthcare Center — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 3/5
- Hurricane Health and Rehabilitation — Hurricane, UT · overall 2/5
- Mt Ogden Health and Rehabilitation Center — Washington Terrace, UT · overall 5/5
- Orem Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Orem, UT · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How are lab results filed and reviewed, and how quickly does the doctor see abnormal results?"
- "For services you don't staff in-house, which outside professionals do you contract with?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Utah midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 54% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 16 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 38 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stonehenge of South Jordan | 3.2 mi | South Jordan, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Cascades at Riverwalk | 4.0 mi | Midvale, UT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare Taylorsville | 4.0 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Legacy Village Rehabilitation | 4.5 mi | Taylorsville, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rocky Mountain Care - Riverton | 4.6 mi | Riverton, UT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sandy Health and Rehab | 4.7 mi | Sandy, UT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Neurorestorative | 6.3 mi | Riverton, UT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aspen Ridge Transitional Rehab | 6.5 mi | Murray, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aspen Ridge West Transitional Rehab | 6.5 mi | Murray, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Rocky Mountain Care - Cottage on Vine | 7.0 mi | Murray, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rocky Mountain Care - Hunter Hollow | 7.7 mi | West Valley City, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Meadow Peak Rehabilitation | 7.8 mi | Taylorsville, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Salt Lake, UT — 35 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Draper Rehabilitation and Care Center — Draper, UT · overall 4/5
- Highland Care Center — Holladay, UT · overall 5/5
- Holladay Healthcare Center — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 3/5
- Little Cottonwood Rehabilitation and Nursing — South Salt Lake, UT · overall 5/5
- Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 1/5abuse
- Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 2/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465108.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).