13747 South Redwood Road, Riverton, UT 84065 (opens Google Maps) · Salt Lake County · (801) 417-9400· 64 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Mar 25, 2013 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: NEURORESTORATIVE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 30, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 7, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 20, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 15, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 20, 2023 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 4, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint F-0604
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| Apr 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 20, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Apr 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Sep 16, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Sep 16, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 5 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
3 fines totaling $97,796.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2025 | Fine | $66,079 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | Fine | $10,033 |
| Feb 20, 2024 | Fine | $21,684 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Utah avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.97 | 3.87 | 3.95 | bottom 12% in Utah; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.99 | 1.17 | 0.69 | bottom 48% in Utah; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.66 | 3.39 | 3.50 | bottom 13% in Utah; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.89 | 0.88 | 0.48 | top 3% in Utah; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.4 | 50.7 | 45.8 | top 45% in Utah; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 60.0 | 40.6 | 42.9 | bottom 20% in Utah; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.10, RN 2.38, weekend 6.38.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (7.10 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Neurorestorative. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caremeridian LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2017 |
| Celtic Intermediate Corp. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/08/2019 |
| National Mentor Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 08/15/2008 |
| National Mentor Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/15/2008 |
| National Mentor Holdings, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/15/2008 |
| National Mentor LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/15/2008 |
| Cohen, Brett | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/15/2008 |
| Cohen, Brett | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/15/2008 |
| Cohen, Brett | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/15/2008 |
| Duffy, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/17/2018 |
| Duffy, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/17/2018 |
| Gladitsch, Peter | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Kuluris, Bruce | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/17/2018 |
| Kuluris, Bruce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/17/2018 |
| Martin, Gina | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| McKinney, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/21/2019 |
| McKinney, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/21/2019 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Neurorestorative — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocky Mountain Care - Riverton | 2.1 mi | Riverton, UT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Stonehenge of South Jordan | 4.2 mi | South Jordan, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Draper Rehabilitation and Care Center | 4.4 mi | Draper, UT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pointe Meadows Health and Rehabilitation | 5.7 mi | Lehi, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Copper Ridge Health Care | 6.3 mi | West Jordan, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sandy Health and Rehab | 6.5 mi | Sandy, UT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cascades at Riverwalk | 8.5 mi | Midvale, UT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare Taylorsville | 9.4 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aspen Ridge Transitional Rehab | 9.7 mi | Murray, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rocky Mountain Care - Cottage on Vine | 10.6 mi | Murray, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Legacy Village Rehabilitation | 10.6 mi | Taylorsville, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aspen Ridge West Transitional Rehab | 11.2 mi | Murray, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Salt Lake, UT — 35 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465179.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details