Torrington Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC
80 Fern Dr, Torrington, CT 06790 · Nw Hills County · 75 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1971
Part of chain: ESSENTIAL HEALTHCARE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.71
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 19, 2019 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Sep 19, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (41)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Aug 28, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 24, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 17).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 15 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 18 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Connecticut avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.71 | 3.80 | 3.95 | top 12% in Connecticut; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.20 | 0.70 | 0.69 | top 9% in Connecticut; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.96 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 20% in Connecticut; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.69 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 14% in Connecticut; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 21.1 | 37.4 | 45.8 | top 5% in Connecticut; top 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 38.9 | 38.6 | 42.9 | bottom 49% in Connecticut; top 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.51, RN 1.15, weekend 3.80. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landa, Joshua | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 38% | 11/01/2021 |
| Landa, Sari | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 11/01/2021 |
| Mayer, Abraham | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Mayer, Berry | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Mayer, Moshe | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Mayer, Yossi | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Salamon, Menajem | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 44% | 11/01/2021 |
| Salamon, Mordejai | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 11/01/2021 |
| Brown, Natalie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/25/2025 |
| Brown, Natalie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/13/2025 |
| Burg & Weingarten, Cpa, PC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2021 |
| Gewirtz, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Landa, Joshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2025 |
| Landa, Sari | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2025 |
| Raad, Marc | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2021 |
| Raad, Marc | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2025 |
| Salamon, Menajem | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2016 |
| Salamon, Menajem | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2025 |
| Salamon, Mordejai | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2025 |
| Zella Healthcare Consulting LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2021 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wolcott Hall Nursing Center, INC | 1.0 mi | Torrington, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Havencare at Litchfield Woods | 1.7 mi | Torrington, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Havencare at Valerie Manor | 1.9 mi | Torrington, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Cherry Brook Health Care Center | 9.8 mi | Canton, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cook Willow Health & Rehabilitation Center, INC. | 10.2 mi | Plymouth, CT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ingraham Manor Rehab and Nursing | 12.4 mi | Bristol, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pines at Bristol for Nursing & Rehabilitation, the | 12.7 mi | Bristol, CT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avon Health Center | 13.0 mi | Avon, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Apple Rehab Avon | 13.0 mi | Avon, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Civita Care Sheriden Woods | 13.2 mi | Bristol, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Torrington →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075105.