How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Community Convalescent Center of San Bernardino
1676 Medical Ctr Dr., San Bernardino, CA 92411 (opens Google Maps) · San Bernardino County · (909) 887-6481· 84 certified beds · avg 14 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1973 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 24, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.22
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. F-0881
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 20, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 20, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Oct 20, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Oct 20, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.22
California average: 4.31
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.02
California average: 0.61
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.85
California average: 3.90
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.22 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 43% in California; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.02 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 11% in California; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.85 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 42% in California; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.89 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 3% in California; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 23.9 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 15% in California; top 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 26% in California; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 9.85, RN 2.38, weekend 8.98.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (9.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Community Convalescent Center of San Bernardino. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Hospital of San Bernardino | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 03/01/2020 |
| Dignity Community Care | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 02/01/2019 |
| Collison, June | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2012 |
| Collison, June | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2012 |
| Collison, June | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2012 |
| Commonspirit Health | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Daly, Gail | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Davis, Claudia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2017 |
| Evans, David | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
| Evans, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
| Gonzalez, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2017 |
| Henley, Nicole | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2019 |
| Lee, Vicki | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2017 |
| Mawad, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2017 |
| Myrell, Antonio | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2017 |
| Negusse, Johnny | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| O'Quinn, Marvin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Petersdorf, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Ramirez, Gabriel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2017 |
| Scharmann, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Commonspirit Health — 18 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Community Hospital of San Bernardino DP SNF — San Bernardino, CA · overall 2/5
- Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF — Santa Maria, CA · overall 5/5
- St. John's Hospital Camarillo D/P SNF — Camarillo, CA · overall 5/5
- Mount St Francis Nursing Center — Colorado Springs, CO · overall 2/5abuse
- Bishop Drumm Retirement Center — Johnston, IA · overall 1/5SFF
- Madonna Manor — Villa Hills, KY · overall 1/5
- Lakewood Care Center — Baudette, MN · overall 4/5
- St Francis Home — Breckenridge, MN · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 17 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 24% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 61 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Hospital of San Bernardino DP SNF | 0.0 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Arrowhead Springs Healthcare | 2.3 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Medical Center Convalescent Hospital | 2.3 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Valley Healthcare Center | 2.3 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waterman Canyon Post Acute | 2.4 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Shandin Hills Behavior Therapy Center | 3.3 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Arrowhead Healthcare Center, LLC | 3.5 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hillcrest Nursing Home | 3.5 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Haven Post Acute | 3.6 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Del Rosa Villa | 4.1 mi | San Bernardino, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Rialto Post Acute Center | 4.5 mi | Rialto, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Laurel Convalescent Hospital | 5.2 mi | Fontana, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in San Bernardino, CA — 55 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Community Extended Care Hospital of Montclair — Montclair, CA · overall 5/5
- Creekside Post Acute — Yucaipa, CA · overall 3/5
- Desert Ridge Transitional Care Center, LP — Victorville, CA · overall —/5
- Grand Terrace Health Care Center — Grand Terrace, CA · overall 5/5
- Heritage Gardens Health Care Center — Loma Linda, CA · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056107.