CaliforniaSan Bernardino

Shandin Hills Behavior Therapy Center

4164 N 4th Ave, San Bernardino, CA 92407 · San Bernardino County · 78 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1974

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.85
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 20, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Feb 20, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 15, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Nov 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 3, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Aug 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360F
202460F
202520D
202640F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.854.313.95bottom 30% in California; top 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.370.610.69bottom 26% in California; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.583.903.50bottom 37% in California; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.510.48bottom 11% in California; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.436.745.8bottom 34% in California; top 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.038.142.9bottom 47% in California; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.55, RN 0.25, weekend 2.38. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ownership Data Not Available

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hillcrest Nursing Home0.3 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★★5/5
Arrowhead Healthcare Center, LLC1.2 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Waterman Canyon Post Acute3.2 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Community Convalescent Center of San Bernardino3.3 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★★5/5
Community Hospital of San Bernardino DP SNF3.3 miSan Bernardino, CA★★☆☆☆3/5
Valley Healthcare Center3.3 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆3/5
Medical Center Convalescent Hospital3.5 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Haven Post Acute3.5 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Arrowhead Springs Healthcare3.7 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Del Rosa Villa4.3 miSan Bernardino, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Sierra Vista5.2 miHighland, CA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Laurel Convalescent Hospital6.8 miFontana, CA★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in San Bernardino →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 05A208.