CaliforniaSan Bernardino

Arrowhead Healthcare Center, LLC

4343 N Sierra Way, San Bernardino, CA 92407 · San Bernardino County · 58 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Aug 13, 2015

Part of chain: CRYSTAL SOLORZANO (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 9, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Apr 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Dec 19, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 19, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Oct 18, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310B
2024120F
202510F
202690F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.014.313.95top 14% in California; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.350.610.69bottom 22% in California; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.293.903.50top 21% in California; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.510.48bottom 10% in California; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.636.745.8top 31% in California; top 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.038.142.9bottom 29% in California; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.65, RN 0.33, weekend 3.98. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ahcst LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest49%06/20/2024
Cohen, RachelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest51%06/20/2024
Dionisio, PaolaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest49%06/20/2024
Renew Health Group LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest51%06/20/2024
Rust, JadenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2024
Cohen, RachelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Cohen, RachelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2024
Hage, JeanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Hage, JeanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Martinez, AdrienneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2023
Martinez, AdrienneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2023
Martinez, AdrienneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2023
Quadros, SylviIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2022
Quadros, SylviIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Shandin Hills Behavior Therapy Center1.2 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★★5/5
Hillcrest Nursing Home1.2 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★★5/5
Haven Post Acute2.5 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Waterman Canyon Post Acute2.6 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Valley Healthcare Center2.7 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆3/5
Medical Center Convalescent Hospital2.9 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Arrowhead Springs Healthcare3.1 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Del Rosa Villa3.3 miSan Bernardino, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Community Convalescent Center of San Bernardino3.5 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★★5/5
Community Hospital of San Bernardino DP SNF3.5 miSan Bernardino, CA★★☆☆☆3/5
Sierra Vista4.1 miHighland, CA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Highland Palms Healthcare Center5.8 miHighland, CA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in San Bernardino →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555896.