CaliforniaSan Bernardino

Arrowhead Springs Healthcare

1335 N. Waterman Ave., San Bernardino, CA 92404 · San Bernardino County · 119 certified beds · avg 109 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1971

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.73
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 4, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jun 4, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 4, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jun 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jun 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jun 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 24, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Aug 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 26, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202290F
202320E
202420D
202580F
202690E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.734.313.95top 20% in California; top 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.610.69bottom 16% in California; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.993.903.50top 34% in California; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.210.510.48bottom 12% in California; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)25.236.745.8top 17% in California; top 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.238.142.9top 23% in California; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.61, RN 0.32, weekend 3.88. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alvarado Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Burnam, SoonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Mangoba, LutherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Mangoba, LutherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Port, BarryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Sanchez Gonzalez, YamalielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Sanchez Gonzalez, YamalielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Willits, AdamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/29/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Medical Center Convalescent Hospital0.2 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Valley Healthcare Center0.4 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆3/5
Waterman Canyon Post Acute0.5 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Haven Post Acute1.6 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Del Rosa Villa1.9 miSan Bernardino, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Community Convalescent Center of San Bernardino2.3 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★★5/5
Community Hospital of San Bernardino DP SNF2.3 miSan Bernardino, CA★★☆☆☆3/5
Sierra Vista3.0 miHighland, CA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Arrowhead Healthcare Center, LLC3.1 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★☆4/5
Shandin Hills Behavior Therapy Center3.7 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★★5/5
Hillcrest Nursing Home3.9 miSan Bernardino, CA★★★★★5/5
Highland Palms Healthcare Center4.0 miHighland, CA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in San Bernardino →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055708.