Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA (194 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 8, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$6,201
Fines, last 3 years
3.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaintF-0684
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. F-0569
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. F-0577
View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
Date
Severity
What the facility was cited for
Apr 20, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Jan 8, 2026
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · F-0569
Jan 8, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577
Jan 8, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jan 8, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Jan 8, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Jan 8, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Apr 24, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655
Apr 24, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658
Apr 24, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726
Dec 10, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Dec 7, 2023
F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Dec 7, 2023
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Inspection trend by year
Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations:
2
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2024
All citations:
1
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2025
All citations:
3
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2026
All citations:
7
Serious citations (G–L):
0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Year
Citations
Serious (G–L)
Worst severity that year
2023
2
0
F
2024
1
0
E
2025
3
0
D
2026
7
0
E
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
Date
Type
Amount / length
Dec 7, 2023
Fine
$6,201
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityRhode Island averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility:
3.91
Rhode Island average:
3.88
U.S. average:
3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility:
0.71
Rhode Island average:
0.80
U.S. average:
0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility:
3.43
Rhode Island average:
3.48
U.S. average:
3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Measure
This facility
Rhode Island avg
U.S. avg
Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
3.91
3.88
3.95
top 36% in Rhode Island; top 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours
0.71
0.80
0.69
bottom 42% in Rhode Island; top 36% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing
3.43
3.48
3.50
top 41% in Rhode Island; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)
0.34
0.55
0.48
bottom 16% in Rhode Island; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)
37.4
40.6
45.8
top 42% in Rhode Island; top 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)
20.8
37.9
42.9
top 20% in Rhode Island; top 16% in the U.S.
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.07, RN 0.73, weekend 3.57.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.07 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cherry Hill Manor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
10/22/2025
Fletcher, Todd
Individual
Corporate Director
NOT APPLICABLE
05/01/2021
Fletcher, Todd
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
11/02/2020
Fletcher, Todd
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
05/01/2021
Gerber, Kathleen
Individual
Managing Control - Governing Body
NOT APPLICABLE
12/01/2013
Gerber, Kathleen
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
12/01/2013
Gerber, Kathleen
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
02/20/2025
Henry, Terry
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
08/16/1999
Lay, Lisa
Individual
Corporate Director
NOT APPLICABLE
04/24/2017
Lay, Lisa
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
02/08/2018
Lay, Lisa
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
04/24/2017
Life Care Centers of America, INC.
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
10/01/1996
Life Care Centers of America, INC.
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
08/31/2000
Long, Zofia
Individual
Managing Control - Governing Body
NOT APPLICABLE
03/15/2004
Long, Zofia
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
03/15/2004
Preston, Aubrey
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
11/27/2024
Preston, Forrest
Individual
Corporate Director
NOT APPLICABLE
01/06/1976
Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Life Care Centers of America — 194 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
CMS records place this facility in Providence, RI — 41 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.