How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Chapel Hill Community
12200 Strausser St NW, Canal Fulton, OH 44614 (opens Google Maps) · Stark County · (330) 854-4177· 80 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1980 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: UNITED CHURCH HOMES (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 24, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.07
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. F-0698
The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. F-0758
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Nov 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · F-0825 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2022 | 13 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.07
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.46
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.56
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.07 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 14% in Ohio; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 32% in Ohio; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.56 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 15% in Ohio; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 33% in Ohio; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.4 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 39% in Ohio; top 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 31% in Ohio; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.44, weekend 3.40.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.89 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Chapel Hill Community. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Church Homes, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2000 |
| Bailey, Peter | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Bates, Trevor | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Baughman, Cheryl | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/26/1990 |
| Benjamin, Pamela | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Bills, Ashley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2022 |
| Black, Geoffrey | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Bollinger, Nathan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2023 |
| Brubaker, Tamra | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/19/2022 |
| Cannone, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/06/2012 |
| Cannone, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/06/2012 |
| Covalesky, Jenna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/22/2017 |
| Cuenot, Jordan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2024 |
| D'agostino, Joanna | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Durbin, Debra | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/08/2022 |
| Dye, Marc | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2014 |
| Eusanio, Vincent | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Farrell, Laura | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/26/1996 |
| Graham, George | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Hawes-Saunders, Ro Nita | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 48 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 28 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain United Church Homes — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Four Winds Nursing Facility — Jackson, OH · overall 3/5
- Harmar Place Nursing and Rehabilitation — Marietta, OH · overall 1/5
- Parkvue Health Care Center — Sandusky, OH · overall 5/5
- S.e.m. Haven Health Care Center — Milford, OH · overall 5/5
- Trinity Community — Beavercreek, OH · overall 3/5
- Trinity Community at Fairborn — Fairborn, OH · overall 4/5
- Westerwood Rehabilitation — Columbus, OH · overall 5/5
- Brookhaven Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Brookville, OH · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 48 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 70 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Pavilion at Canal Fulton for Nursing and Rehab | 2.5 mi | Canal Fulton, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rose Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.7 mi | Massillon, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Luke Lutheran Community-Portage Lakes | 4.8 mi | Akron, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Altercare of Nobles Pond, INC | 5.7 mi | Canton, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Amherst Meadows Skilled Nursing and Rehab | 6.3 mi | Massillon, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Laurels of Massillon, the | 6.7 mi | Massillon, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation LTD | 7.2 mi | Akron, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pleasant View Health Care Center | 7.3 mi | Barberton, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pebble Creek Healthcare Center | 7.6 mi | Akron, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Barberton Post Acute | 7.7 mi | Barberton, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Doylestown Health Care Center | 7.9 mi | Doylestown, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadow Wind Health Care Center | 8.2 mi | Massillon, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Stark, OH — 33 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Country Lawn Ctr for Rehab — Navarre, OH · overall 5/5
- Gardens of Belden Village — Canton, OH · overall 1/5
- Green Meadows Skilled Nursing and Rehab — Louisville, OH · overall 2/5
- Hall of Fame Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Canton, OH · overall 2/5
- Hanover Healthcare Center — Massillon, OH · overall 2/5
- Legends Care Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Massillon, OH · overall 2/5
- Louisville Gardens Care Center — Louisville, OH · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365494.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).