OhioMassillon

Rose Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation

5425 High Mill Avenue NW, Massillon, OH 44646 · Stark County · 171 certified beds · avg 161 residents/day · certified since Apr 20, 1973

Part of chain: SPRENGER HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Sep 13, 2021 · F-0880

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Oct 21, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 20, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 15, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 20, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Nov 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Nov 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Nov 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Nov 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died.
Nov 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Nov 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 19, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 19, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Aug 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Aug 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2021▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 13, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Sep 13, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Sep 13, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 13, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 13, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 7, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Nov 7, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Nov 7, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 7, 2019C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 7, 2019C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019110E
202161L ▲
2023150E
202411G ▲
202510D
202610E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.443.453.95top 41% in Ohio; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.680.600.69top 27% in Ohio; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.133.073.50top 36% in Ohio; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.490.420.48top 29% in Ohio; top 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.248.745.8top 41% in Ohio; bottom 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)31.843.942.9top 31% in Ohio; top 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.21, RN 0.63, weekend 2.92. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bluesky Healthcare INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/21/2010
Hutsenpiller, WendieIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest18%03/21/2011
Malanowski, KennethIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest20%03/21/2011
Sprenger, NicoleIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest31%03/21/2011
Sprenger, TraceyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest31%03/21/2011
BSH Investments LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/21/2010
Citrin Cooperman and Company, LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2025
CMS & Co. Management Services, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/22/2001
CMS & Co. Management Services, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2025
Courtock, MelissaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2002
Courtock, MelissaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2002
Delta Health Care Consultants, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Didomenico, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2024
Didomenico, RichardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2024
Epperly, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2022
Epperly, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2022
Fox, EmilyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Fox, EmilyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Fox, EmilyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Gollinger, KristenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/13/2000

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Pavilion at Canal Fulton for Nursing and Rehab1.5 miCanal Fulton, OH★★☆☆☆3/5
Altercare of Nobles Pond, INC2.3 miCanton, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Laurels of Massillon, the3.1 miMassillon, OH★★★★★4/5
Amherst Meadows Skilled Nursing and Rehab3.3 miMassillon, OH★★★★★5/5
Chapel Hill Community3.7 miCanal Fulton, OH★★★★☆4/5
Meadow Wind Health Care Center4.8 miMassillon, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Gardens of Belden Village5.1 miCanton, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5
Hanover Healthcare Center5.3 miMassillon, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Legends Care Rehabilitation and Nursing Center6.6 miMassillon, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Saint Luke Lutheran Home6.6 miNorth Canton, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Astoria Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation6.8 miCanton, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Pines Healthcare Center6.9 miCanton, OH★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Massillon →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365289.