How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
One Country Lane, Brookville, OH 45309 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (937) 833-2133· 99 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Oct 2, 1979 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: UNITED CHURCH HOMES (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint F-0657
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint F-0679
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint · F-0679 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint · F-0687 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Sep 2, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 2, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · F-0810 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.83 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 21% in Ohio; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 44% in Ohio; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.40 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 21% in Ohio; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 6% in Ohio; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.9 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 8% in Ohio; top 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 31% in Ohio; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.92, RN 0.53, weekend 3.48.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.92 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Brookhaven Nursing & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howett, Bryan | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 05/29/2017 |
| Jackson, Shirley | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 09/19/2016 |
| United Church Homes, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 12/27/2006 |
| HCF Management, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Miller, Terry | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Miller, Terry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Nelson, Denise | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Nelson, Denise | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Prunier, Kenneth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Prunier, Kenneth | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Smith, Christy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2022 |
| Unverferth, Chad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain United Church Homes — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Englewood Health and Rehab | 6.2 mi | Englewood, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aventura at Shiloh Springs | 6.4 mi | Trotwood, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| New Lebanon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 6.6 mi | New Lebanon, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Grace Brethren Village | 6.9 mi | Englewood, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cypress Pointe Health Campus | 7.0 mi | Englewood, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Trotwood Health & Rehab LLC | 7.7 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Arc at Trotwood LLC | 7.8 mi | Dayton, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Maria Joseph Living Care Center | 8.1 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Siena Woods Care Center | 9.8 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aventura at Carriage Inn | 9.9 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Carecore at Mary Scott | 10.5 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Riverside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 11.3 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, OH — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365422.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details