Centerville Health and Rehab

7300 McEwen Road, Dayton, OH 45459 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (937) 433-3441· 120 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER (79 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Jul 8, 2025

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

2.63

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 56 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

May 28, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · from a complaint F-0790
May 28, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
Dec 16, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · from a complaint F-0576

View all 56 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0790
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Dec 16, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · from a complaint · F-0576
Dec 16, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
Dec 16, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint · F-0770
Jul 8, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jul 8, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jul 8, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770
Jul 8, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Jul 8, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
Jul 8, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600
Jul 8, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Jul 8, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610
Jul 8, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
Jul 8, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
May 16, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
May 7, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925
Apr 4, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925
Mar 4, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925
Mar 4, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
Dec 2, 2024	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925
Dec 2, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Dec 2, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint · F-0688
Dec 2, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint · F-0759
Apr 20, 2022	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Apr 20, 2022	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Apr 20, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Apr 20, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Apr 20, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Apr 20, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Apr 20, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610
Apr 20, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Apr 20, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Apr 20, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698
Apr 20, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700
Apr 20, 2022	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730
Jun 20, 2019	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730
Jun 20, 2019	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jun 20, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Jun 20, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Jun 20, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Jun 20, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Jun 20, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jun 20, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808
Jun 20, 2019	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 10).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2019

2022

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2019	20	F
2022	12	F
2024	4	F
2025	18	F
2026	2	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityOhio averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

2.63

3.45

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.47

0.60

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.50

3.07

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Ohio avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.63	3.45	3.95	bottom 7% in Ohio; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.47	0.60	0.69	bottom 35% in Ohio; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.50	3.07	3.50	bottom 12% in Ohio; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.41	0.42	0.48	top 45% in Ohio; top 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	66.7	48.7	45.8	bottom 11% in Ohio; bottom 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	82.4	43.9	42.9	bottom 4% in Ohio; bottom 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.03, RN 0.55, weekend 2.88.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.03 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Centerville Health and Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Acm Ashem Holdings, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	09/29/2022
Flyer 3 Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	09/29/2022
Flyer 3 Operations Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	09/29/2022
FTK Flyer Oh, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	09/29/2022
Zanziper Family Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	09/29/2022
Acm Ashem Holdings, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Centerville Property LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Mortgage Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Dixon, Koby	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/03/2025
Fasten Halberstam LLP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Flyer 3 Holdings LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
FTK Flyer Oh, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Gale Healthcare Solutions LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Krieser, Akiva	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Med-Net Compliance LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2018
Moerman, Rafael	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Moerman, Rafael	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
NPNH1 LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Ovation Rehabilitation Services LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2022
Rarick, Jon	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/30/2024

Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper — 79 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Englewood Health and Rehab — Englewood, OH · overall 1/5
Jamestown Place Health and Rehab — Jamestown, OH · overall 2/5
Portsmouth Health and Rehab — Portsmouth, OH · overall 5/5
Xenia Health and Rehab — Xenia, OH · overall 1/5
Collierville Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC — Collierville, TN · overall 2/5
Fairpark Health and Rehabilitation — Maryville, TN · overall 2/5
Magnolia Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation — Covington, TN · overall 1/5
Midtown Center for Health and Rehabilitation — Memphis, TN · overall 2/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 78 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do residents get routine dental care, and what happens if someone has a dental emergency at night?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How can my family member make private phone or video calls, and can we see where?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"How quickly are lab tests done and results acted on when a resident's doctor orders them?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Ohio midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 67% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 27 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 68 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Centerville Post Acute	0.9 mi	Centerville, OH	★★★☆☆	4/5
Bethany Village	1.9 mi	Dayton, OH	★★★★★	5/5
Vienna Springs Health Campus	2.0 mi	Dayton, OH	★★★★★	4/5
Wood Glen Alzheimer's Community	2.3 mi	Dayton, OH	★★★☆☆	3/5
St Leonard HCC	2.6 mi	Centerville, OH	★★★☆☆	3/5
Laurels of West Carrollton the	3.0 mi	West Carrollton, OH	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Walnut Creek Nursing Center	3.0 mi	Kettering, OH	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Sycamorespring of Miamisburg	3.3 mi	Miamisburg, OH	★★★★★	4/5
Sycamore Trails Post Acute	3.3 mi	Miamisburg, OH	★★★★☆	3/5
Austin Trace Health and Rehabilitation	3.5 mi	Centerville, OH	★★★★☆	4/5
Oak Creek Terrace INC	3.8 mi	Kettering, OH	★★★☆☆	3/5
The Laurels of Kettering	4.4 mi	Kettering, OH	★★☆☆☆	1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, OH — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Cypress Pointe Health Campus — Englewood, OH · overall 5/5
Dunbar Health & Rehab Center — Dayton, OH · overall 3/5
Englewood Health and Rehab — Englewood, OH · overall 1/5
Gem City Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Dayton, OH · overall 3/5
Grace Brethren Village — Englewood, OH · overall 4/5
Grafton Oaks Nursing Center — Dayton, OH · overall 2/5abuse
Kettering Heights Post Acute — Kettering, OH · overall 2/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Dayton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365764.