How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
4330 South 144th Street, Omaha, NE 68137 (opens Google Maps) · Douglas County · (402) 614-4000· 140 certified beds · avg 129 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: VETTER SENIOR LIVING (22 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 9 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint F-0551
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. F-0610
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint · F-0551 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Nebraska avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.88 | 4.33 | 3.95 | top 25% in Nebraska; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.04 | 0.72 | 0.69 | top 13% in Nebraska; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.35 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 19% in Nebraska; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.86 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 8% in Nebraska; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 33.7 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 19% in Nebraska; top 21% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 35.5 | 44.1 | 42.9 | top 42% in Nebraska; top 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.84, RN 1.03, weekend 4.31.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.84 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Brookestone Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vetter Senior Living | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/23/2016 |
| Meredith, Abigail | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/05/2020 |
| Meredith, Abigail | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/02/2020 |
| Schindler, Lindsey | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Schindler, Lindsey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Stuhr, Brian | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Stuhr, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2017 |
| Stuhr, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vanekeren, Glenn | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vanekeren, Glenn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2017 |
| Vanekeren, Glenn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vetter Senior Living | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/23/2016 |
| Vetter, Eldora | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vetter, Eldora | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2017 |
| Vetter, Eldora | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vetter, Jack | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vetter, Jack | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2017 |
| Vetter, Jack | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| VSL Vetter Health Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Vetter Senior Living — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newport House | 1.0 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Hillcrest Millard LLC | 1.1 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Society - Millard | 1.5 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Banyan at Montclair | 1.5 mi | Omaha, NE | —/5 | SFF | |
| Rose Blumkin Jewish Home | 2.9 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Lighthouse at Lakeside Village | 2.9 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Old Mill Rehabilitation | 4.8 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Brookestone Meadows Rehabilitation and Care Center | 5.5 mi | Elkhorn, NE | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Emerald Nursing & Rehabilitation Mercy | 6.0 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Brookestone of Papillion | 6.5 mi | Papillion, NE | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Elkhorn | 6.9 mi | Elkhorn, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Emerald Nursing & Rehab Omaha | 7.3 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Douglas, NE — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285242.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details