Nebraska ›Omaha

The Lighthouse at Lakeside Village

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

17600 Arbor Street, Omaha, NE 68130 (opens Google Maps) · Douglas County · (402) 717-0200· 54 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since May 26, 2009 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: IMMANUEL (3 facilities, chain avg rating 4.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 12, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.49
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint F-0607

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609

  3. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 27, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607
May 27, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Mar 12, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Apr 4, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Apr 4, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Apr 4, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Mar 21, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202430D
202550F
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityNebraska averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.49
Nebraska average: 4.33
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.47
Nebraska average: 0.72
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.79
Nebraska average: 3.79
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.494.333.95top 11% in Nebraska; top 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.470.720.69top 2% in Nebraska; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.793.793.50top 9% in Nebraska; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.080.470.48top 4% in Nebraska; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.448.745.8bottom 49% in Nebraska; bottom 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)18.244.142.9top 14% in Nebraska; top 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.31, RN 1.42, weekend 4.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Lighthouse at Lakeside Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alloway, CindyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Balluff, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Bear, ScottIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/13/2017
Bear, ScottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/13/2017
Bear, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/13/2017
Benson, EllsworthIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2020
Bergman-Evans, BrendaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Bothof, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Bothof, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Bullock, SteveIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Burns, RandalIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2020
Carmel-Cooper, BiancaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Cress, AllenIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Friedlund, DannyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Gurley, EricIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2013
Gurley, EricIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2013
Gurley, EricIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2013
Gurley, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2013
Hawlik, TeresaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Howerter, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2020

Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Immanuel — 3 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
  • "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
  • "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 47% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 35 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 34 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Newport House2.5 miOmaha, NE★★★★★3/5
Brookestone Meadows Rehabilitation and Care Center2.5 miElkhorn, NE★★★★★5/5
Brookestone Village2.9 miOmaha, NE★★★★★4/5
The Banyan at Montclair3.3 miOmaha, NE—/5SFF
Hillcrest Millard LLC3.5 miOmaha, NE★☆☆☆☆2/5
Rose Blumkin Jewish Home3.9 miOmaha, NE★★★★★4/5
Life Care Center of Elkhorn4.3 miElkhorn, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Good Samaritan Society - Millard4.4 miOmaha, NE★★★★☆4/5
Old Mill Rehabilitation5.8 miOmaha, NE★★★☆☆3/5
Adept Nursing & Rehab of Gretna7.6 miGretna, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehabilitation Mercy8.4 miOmaha, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Brookestone of Papillion9.3 miPapillion, NE★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Douglas, NE — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Omaha →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285280.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details