How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
7915 North 30th Street, Omaha, NE 68112 (opens Google Maps) · Douglas County · (402) 827-6000· 126 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Nov 21, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. F-0561
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint · F-0757 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules. · from a complaint · F-0620 |
| Jun 8, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Nebraska avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.76 | 4.33 | 3.95 | top 31% in Nebraska; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.69 | top 37% in Nebraska; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.34 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 19% in Nebraska; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 22% in Nebraska; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.4 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 40% in Nebraska; top 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.8 | 44.1 | 42.9 | top 35% in Nebraska; top 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.41, RN 0.73, weekend 4.02.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.41 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Florence Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloechle, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Butterfield, Marc | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Higgins, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2015 |
| Holley, Lyn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Jordan, Lois | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2015 |
| Jordan, Lois | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2015 |
| Jordan, Lois | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2015 |
| Midwest Geriatrics INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Okeefe, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Thacker, Debra | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Thacker, Debra | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Thacker, Debra | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Wester, Rebecca | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerald Nursing & Rehab Legacy Pointe LLC | 0.4 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Life Care Center of Omaha | 2.8 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Quality Living, INC. | 3.3 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ambassador Health of Omaha | 3.6 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Keystone Ridge Post Acute Nursing and Rehabilitati | 4.2 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Maple Crest Health Center | 4.4 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Cypress at Midtown | 5.6 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Douglas County Health Center | 6.0 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St. Joseph Villa Nursing Center | 6.6 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Midlands Living Center L L C | 7.2 mi | Council Bluffs, IA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Emerald Nursing & Rehabilitation Mercy | 7.4 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Emerald Nursing & Rehab Omaha | 7.5 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Douglas, NE — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285173.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details