Florence Home
7915 North 30th Street, Omaha, NE 68112 · Douglas County · 126 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Nov 21, 1995
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (15)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint |
| Aug 1, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules. · from a complaint |
| Jun 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Nebraska avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.76 | 4.33 | 3.95 | top 31% in Nebraska; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.69 | top 37% in Nebraska; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.34 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 19% in Nebraska; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 22% in Nebraska; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.4 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 40% in Nebraska; top 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.8 | 44.1 | 42.9 | top 35% in Nebraska; top 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.41, RN 0.73, weekend 4.02. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloechle, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Butterfield, Marc | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Higgins, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2015 |
| Holley, Lyn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Jordan, Lois | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2015 |
| Jordan, Lois | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2015 |
| Jordan, Lois | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2015 |
| Midwest Geriatrics INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Okeefe, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Thacker, Debra | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Thacker, Debra | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
| Thacker, Debra | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2015 |
| Wester, Rebecca | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2009 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerald Nursing & Rehab Legacy Pointe LLC | 0.4 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Life Care Center of Omaha | 2.8 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Quality Living, INC. | 3.3 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ambassador Health of Omaha | 3.6 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Keystone Ridge Post Acute Nursing and Rehabilitati | 4.2 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Maple Crest Health Center | 4.4 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Cypress at Midtown | 5.6 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Douglas County Health Center | 6.0 mi | Omaha, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St. Joseph Villa Nursing Center | 6.6 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Midlands Living Center L L C | 7.2 mi | Council Bluffs, IA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Emerald Nursing & Rehabilitation Mercy | 7.4 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Emerald Nursing & Rehab Omaha | 7.5 mi | Omaha, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285173.