New YorkRome

Betsy Ross Rehabilitation Center, INC

1 Elsie Street, Rome, NY 13440 · Oneida County · 120 certified beds · avg 111 residents/day · certified since Jan 10, 1992

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$32,254
Fines, last 3 years
3.13
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 29, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 17, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Jun 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jun 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 29, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy.
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 8, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Oct 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202170E
202370E
202411G ▲
202560D
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

4 fines totaling $32,254.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 29, 2024Fine$9,318
Sep 18, 2023Fine$4,587
Sep 11, 2023Fine$4,587
Aug 21, 2023Fine$13,762

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.133.583.95bottom 33% in New York; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.300.680.69bottom 3% in New York; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.793.133.50bottom 37% in New York; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.190.480.48bottom 13% in New York; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.640.345.8bottom 17% in New York; bottom 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)80.039.842.9bottom 3% in New York; bottom 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.33, weekend 3.02. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Altman, DonaldIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest45%05/21/1998
Chiaraluce, JoanneIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%01/01/2011
Altman, DonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/21/1998
Brodock, ChristineIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/20/2017
Chamberlin, BrianIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/17/2016
Chiaraluce, JoanneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bethany Gardens Skilled Living Center0.8 miRome, NY★★★★☆4/5
Rome Memorial Hospital, INC - R H C F1.1 miRome, NY★★★★☆4/5
The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Rome1.1 miRome, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Colonial Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.0 miRome, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Trustees of Eastern Star Hall & Home of the N Y S8.6 miOriskany, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Presbyterian Home for Central New York INC12.6 miNew Hartford, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Katherine Luther Residential HLTH Care & Rehab13.1 miClinton, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center13.5 miUtica, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Oneida Health Rehabilitation and Extended Care14.2 miOneida, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Utica Rehabilitation & Nursing Center14.3 miUtica, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica14.3 miUtica, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
The Pines at Utica Center for Nursing and Rehab14.6 miUtica, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rome →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335727.