How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Beautiful Savior Home
1003 South Cedar Street, Belton, MO 64012 (opens Google Maps) · Cass County · (816) 331-0781· 126 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Apr 26, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SHAFIQ MALIK (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 13, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.50
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. F-0801
View all 22 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · from a complaint · F-0881 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| May 5, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 5, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| May 5, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 5, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| May 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 21, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.50
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.32
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.15
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.50 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 46% in Missouri; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.69 | bottom 32% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.15 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 49% in Missouri; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.48 | bottom 18% in Missouri; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.8 | 56.0 | 45.8 | bottom 49% in Missouri; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 47.8 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.32, weekend 3.10.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.44 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Beautiful Savior Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bleauridge Nursing and Rehab LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 08/30/2024 |
| Bleauridge Nursing and Rehab LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Bleauridge Nursing and Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Haas, Brian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Haas, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2025 |
| Malik, Omer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2024 |
| Malik, Omer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2024 |
| Malik, Shafiq | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Malik, Shafiq | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Smith, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Smith, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Shafiq Malik — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Community Manor — Farmington, MO · overall 3/5
- Crystal Oaks — Festus, MO · overall 4/5
- Fountainbleau Lodge — Cape Girardeau, MO · overall 5/5
- Fountainbleau Nursing Center — Festus, MO · overall 4/5
- Lutheran Nursing Home — Concordia, MO · overall 4/5
- Riverview at the Park Care and Rehabilitation Cent — Sainte Genevieve, MO · overall 4/5
- St Joe Manor — Bonne Terre, MO · overall 1/5
- St Louis Altenheim — Saint Louis, MO · overall —/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
- "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Missouri midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 57% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 70 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care Cent | 1.1 mi | Belton, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Foxwood Springs Living Center | 2.6 mi | Raymore, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sunrise Nursing & Rehabilitation | 4.6 mi | Raymore, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Grandview | 6.9 mi | Grandview, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| The Healthcare Resort of Leawood - Iron Horse HLTH | 8.0 mi | Leawood, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Raintree Village | 8.2 mi | Lees Summit, MO | —/5 | ||
| Bridgewood Health Care Center | 8.6 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Ignite Medical Resort Overland Park LLC | 8.8 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tallgrass Creek, INC | 9.3 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Hilltop at Blue River, the | 9.6 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Village Shalom INC | 9.8 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Carondelet LLC | 10.2 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Cass, MO — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Crown Rehab and Healthcare Center — Harrisonville, MO · overall 2/5
- Golden Years Center for Rehab and Healthcare — Harrisonville, MO · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Meadow View Health & Rehabilitation — Harrisonville, MO · overall 3/5
- Aspire Senior Living Pleasant Hill — Pleasant Hill, MO · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265782.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).