MaineBath

Winship Green Center for Health & Rehab, LLC

51 Winship Street, Bath, ME 04530 · Sagadahoc County · 72 certified beds · avg 66 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1993

Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES (42 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.79
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 23, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Mar 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Mar 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. · from a complaint
Jan 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Jul 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Jul 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jan 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 5, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150E
202360E
2024140E
202510D
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaine avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.794.603.95bottom 13% in Maine; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.591.110.69bottom 3% in Maine; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.514.163.50bottom 17% in Maine; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.490.730.48bottom 23% in Maine; top 35% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.146.745.8bottom 25% in Maine; bottom 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)61.540.242.9bottom 15% in Maine; bottom 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.90, RN 0.61, weekend 3.60. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bokow, BarryIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Geffner, IraIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Gluck, RobertIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Lobell, JonahIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Lowinger, BenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Lowinger, JosephIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Marvin Ostreicher Family Trust 2012OrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Meridian Capital FoundationOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Mso Associates LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Ostreicher, DavidIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Ostreicher, MarcIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Ostreicher, MarvinIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Ostreicher, SusanIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Schoor, KalmanIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Steg, YitzchokIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Susan Ostreicher Family Trust 2012OrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Ventas NHV FundOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
VK Health Facilities LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Weinstock, AbrahamIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013
Almeida, ElizabethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mid Coast Senior Health Center8.4 miBrunswick, ME★★★★★5/5
Horizons Living and Rehab Center8.4 miBrunswick, ME★★★★☆3/5
Gregory Wing of St Andrews Village10.1 miBoothbay Harbor, ME★★★☆☆3/5
Cove's Edge INC15.6 miDamariscotta, ME★★★★☆4/5
Hawthorne House17.4 miFreeport, ME★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bath →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 205078.