How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Aspire Senior Living Oak Grove
2108 SW Mitchell Street, Oak Grove, MO 64075 (opens Google Maps) · Jackson County · (816) 690-4118· 90 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Nov 22, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 2, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint F-0559
The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. F-0847
View all 27 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint · F-0559 |
| Aug 2, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint · F-0622 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint · F-0645 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.27
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.42
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.74
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.27 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 35% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 49% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.74 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 28% in Missouri; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.33 | 0.48 | bottom 21% in Missouri; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.9 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 12% in Missouri; top 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 62.5 | 47.8 | 42.9 | bottom 29% in Missouri; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.73, RN 0.35, weekend 2.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.73 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Aspire Senior Living Oak Grove. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calvert, Gregg | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 12% | 05/01/2022 |
| Steele, Sheri | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 05/01/2022 |
| Brown, Daniel | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Brown, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Calvert, Gregg | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Calvert, Gregg | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
All 6 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Aspire Senior Living — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Aspire Senior Living Platte City — Platte City, MO · overall 1/5
- Aspire Senior Living Pleasant Hill — Pleasant Hill, MO · overall 1/5
- Aspire Senior Living Poplar Bluff — Poplar Bluff, MO · overall 2/5
- Aspire Senior Living Roaring River — Cassville, MO · overall 3/5
- Aspire Senior Living Warsaw — Warsaw, MO · overall 2/5abuse
- Aspire Senior Living Webb City — Webb City, MO · overall 1/5
- Aspire Senior Living Advance — Advance, MO · overall 4/5
- Aspire Senior Living Carthage — Carthage, MO · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you handle room assignments and roommate requests, and do residents get advance written notice before any move?"
- "Is signing an arbitration agreement required for admission, and can we refuse it without affecting my family member's care?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Missouri midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 39% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 25 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Springs Wellness & Rehabilitation | 7.0 mi | Blue Springs, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Ignite Medical Resort St Marys LLC | 7.3 mi | Blue Springs, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Odessa Health Care Center | 9.2 mi | Odessa, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Blue Springs | 11.4 mi | Blue Springs, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 11.8 mi | Independence, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Villages of Jackson Creek | 12.3 mi | Independence, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wilshire at Lakewood Rehab Center | 12.5 mi | Lees Summit, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Sunterra Springs Independence | 12.7 mi | Independence, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| University Health Lakewood Medical Center | 13.8 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Rehabilitation Center of Independence, the | 14.1 mi | Independence, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Abode Health and Wellness Center | 14.2 mi | Independence, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Seasons Rehab and Healthcare Center | 14.3 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Jackson, MO — 39 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Bishop Spencer Place, INC, the — Kansas City, MO · overall 3/5
- Bridgewood Health Care Center — Kansas City, MO · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Carmel Hills Wellness & Rehabilitation — Independence, MO · overall 1/5
- Clara Manor Nursing Home — Kansas City, MO · overall 1/5abuse
- Edgewood Manor Health Care Center — Raytown, MO · overall 1/5abuse
- Gregory Ridge Health Care Center — Kansas City, MO · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center — Kansas City, MO · overall 3/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265710.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).