MissouriKansas City

Bishop Spencer Place, INC, the

4301 Madison Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64111 · Jackson County · 57 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Nov 7, 2003

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,021
Fines, last 3 years
5.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 29, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 9, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 9, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jul 29, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died.
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint
Jul 19, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jul 19, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Jul 19, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jul 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202240E
202310D
2024111J ▲
202690F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,021.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 29, 2024Fine$8,021

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.973.663.95top 3% in Missouri; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.920.490.69top 5% in Missouri; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.833.223.50top 5% in Missouri; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.370.330.48top 24% in Missouri; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.656.045.8top 14% in Missouri; top 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)58.347.842.9bottom 34% in Missouri; bottom 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.46, RN 0.84, weekend 4.41. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Achelphol, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Achelphol, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Calvin, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Calvin, KarenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Coulter, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Coulter, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Elving, BeverlyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Elving, BeverlyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Havenhill, LisaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/19/2020
Havenhill, LisaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/19/2019
Havenhill, LisaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/19/2020
Hutcherson, AnneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Hutcherson, AnneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Jackson, AnthonyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Jackson, AnthonyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/09/2025
Johnson, JaniIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2020
Johnson, JaniIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2020
Johnston, NanetteIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Johnston, NanetteIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Keyse, AndrewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Summit, the0.8 miKansas City, MO★★☆☆☆1/5
Clara Manor Nursing Home1.1 miKansas City, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Parkway Health Care Center2.1 miKansas City, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center3.3 miKansas City, MO★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Myers Nursing & Convalescent Center3.6 miKansas City, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
The Village at Mission3.8 miPrairie Village, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Gregory Ridge Health Care Center4.5 miKansas City, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Armour Oaks Senior Living Community4.7 miKansas City, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Rehab of Kansas City South4.7 miKansas City, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Claridge Court5.0 miPrairie Village, KS★★★★★5/5
Hope Care Center5.0 miKansas City, MO★★★★★4/5
Aspen Health and Wellness5.2 miOverland Park, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Kansas City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265768.