CaliforniaDowney

Brookfield Healthcare Center

9300 Telegraph Road, Downey, CA 90240 · Los Angeles County · 70 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1971

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.49
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 13, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 9, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Oct 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Oct 13, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Oct 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Oct 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Oct 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Aug 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202381G ▲
2024110E
202580E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.494.313.95bottom 10% in California; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.800.610.69top 17% in California; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.223.903.50bottom 12% in California; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.730.510.48top 14% in California; top 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.436.745.8top 50% in California; top 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.238.142.9top 23% in California; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.02, RN 0.93, weekend 3.70. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burnam, SoonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2006
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2006
Caretrust GP LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2003
Caretrust Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2003
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2023
Frischer, AlanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Frischer, AlanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Frischer, AlanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Howell, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2012
Howell, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2012
Howell, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2012
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Kim, JesseIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2023
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2023
Trousdale Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2003

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Riviera Healthcare Center0.8 miPico Rivera, CA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Colonial Gardens Nursing Home1.6 miPico Rivera, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Villa Del Rio Gardens2.0 miBell Gardens, CA★★☆☆☆3/5
Southland2.1 miNorwalk, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Downey Community Health Center2.2 miDowney, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Socal Post-Acute Care2.3 miWhittier, CA★★★☆☆3/5
El Rancho Vista Health Care Center2.5 miPico Rivera, CA★★★★☆3/5
Lakewood Healthcare Center2.7 miDowney, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center2.8 miNorwalk, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Norwalk Skilled Nursing & Wellness Centre, LLC2.8 miNorwalk, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Orchard - Post Acute Care3.0 miWhittier, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Presbyterian Intercomm Hosp DP/SNF3.0 miWhittier, CA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Downey →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056014.