Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ALTERCARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 31, 2025
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Oct 28, 2025
$26,685
Fines, last 3 years
3.35
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 28, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 7, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 8, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 14, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaintF-0921
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaintF-0676
G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaintF-0689
View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
Date
Severity
What the facility was cited for
Mar 16, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921
Feb 5, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint · F-0676
Oct 28, 2025
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jul 31, 2025
F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not have policies on smoking. · F-0926
Jul 31, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jul 31, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Jul 31, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Apr 8, 2025
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jan 29, 2024
F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jan 29, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567
Jan 29, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Jan 29, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Jan 29, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Jan 29, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
May 17, 2021
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
May 17, 2021
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
May 17, 2021
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations:
3
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2024
All citations:
6
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2025
All citations:
6
Serious citations (G–L):
2
2026
All citations:
2
Serious citations (G–L):
0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Year
Citations
Serious (G–L)
Worst severity that year
2021
3
0
E
2024
6
0
F
2025
6
2
G ▲
2026
2
0
D
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
Date
Type
Amount / length
Jan 7, 2026
Fine
$26,685
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility:
3.35
Ohio average:
3.45
U.S. average:
3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility:
0.55
Ohio average:
0.60
U.S. average:
0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility:
2.85
Ohio average:
3.07
U.S. average:
3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Measure
This facility
Ohio avg
U.S. avg
Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
3.35
3.45
3.95
top 48% in Ohio; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours
0.55
0.60
0.69
top 49% in Ohio; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing
2.85
3.07
3.50
bottom 42% in Ohio; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)
0.24
0.42
0.48
bottom 17% in Ohio; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)
42.9
48.7
45.8
top 35% in Ohio; top 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)
57.1
43.9
42.9
bottom 28% in Ohio; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.56, weekend 2.93.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.44 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Altercare of Bucyrus Center Fo. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Andrew M Schroer
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
—
12/15/2015
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Gerald F Schroer Jr
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
—
12/15/2015
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Matthew Schroer
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
—
12/15/2015
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Margaret S Goodman
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
—
12/15/2015
Susanne Schroer Dynasty Trust U/A
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
—
12/15/2015
The Schroer Group, INC.
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
—
10/01/2001
TSG Nursing Centers, INC
Organization
5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
100%
12/13/2002
Altercare of Ohio, INC
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
10/01/2001
Film, George
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
08/01/2018
Goodman, John
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
05/15/2003
Johnson, Kathy
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
01/10/2010
Milbrandt, Michael
Individual
W-2 Managing Employee
NOT APPLICABLE
12/15/2015
Milbrandt, Michael
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
12/15/2015
Mock, Douglas
Individual
W-2 Managing Employee
NOT APPLICABLE
09/20/2021
Mock, Douglas
Individual
Corporate Director
NOT APPLICABLE
09/20/2021
Mock, Douglas
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
09/20/2021
Nutter, Orian
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
10/01/2021
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Altercare — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $26,685
Most serious findings on record:
▲ Oct 28, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, isolated): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Apr 8, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, isolated): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Questions for the administrator:
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
☐ "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
☐ "What are your smoking rules, and how do you keep residents who smoke — and everyone around them — safe?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
☐ "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Ohio midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 43% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
While you're there, notice:
☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)
Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 365625 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)