South CarolinaSpartanburg

White Oak Estates

400 Webber Road, Spartanburg, SC 29302 · Spartanburg County · 88 certified beds · avg 80 residents/day · certified since Sep 27, 1989

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,827
Fines, last 3 years
3.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 26, 2024 · F-0602 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.

Why it matters: Residents can lose money, jewelry, or cherished possessions to theft or misuse.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 22, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 5, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 26, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Mar 15, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370F
202411J ▲
202520E
202620F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,827.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 26, 2024Fine$8,827

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.974.083.95top 47% in South Carolina; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.480.670.69bottom 36% in South Carolina; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.603.553.50top 37% in South Carolina; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.410.48bottom 30% in South Carolina; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)57.145.945.8bottom 22% in South Carolina; bottom 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)69.242.142.9bottom 13% in South Carolina; bottom 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.62, RN 0.44, weekend 3.28. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ownership Data Not Available

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Summit Hills Skilled Nursing Facility1.5 miSpartanburg, SC★★★★☆4/5
Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg3.7 miSpartanburg, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Spartanburg Hospital for Restorative Care SNF3.7 miSpartanburg, SC★★★★★5/5
White Oak Manor - Spartanburg3.8 miSpartanburg, SC★★★★☆4/5
White Oak at North Grove INC4.1 miSpartanburg, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Mountainview Nursing Home4.3 miSpartanburg, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Physical Rehabilitation and Wellness Center of Spa5.3 miSpartanburg, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Valley Falls Terrace6.8 miSpartanburg, SC★★★☆☆4/5
Rosecrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center10.0 miInman, SC★★★★★5/5
Magnolia Manor - Inman13.2 miInman, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Lake Emory Post Acute Care13.3 miInman, SC★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Brookview Healthcare Center13.6 miGaffney, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Spartanburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425290.