1700 Heinzerling Drive, Columbus, OH 43223 (opens Google Maps) · Franklin County · (614) 274-4222· 99 certified beds · avg 89 residents/day · certified since Sep 13, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 30, 2022 · F-0678
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 28, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 6, 2025 · F-0692
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 31, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 6, 2025 · F-0740
The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Why it matters: A resident's untreated mental health needs can worsen and take a toll on their physical health too.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 31, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 30, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 28, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. F-0692
The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. F-0740
The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. F-0570
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. · F-0570 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · F-0691 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Feb 6, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Feb 6, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 14).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 12 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 14 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $24,115.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2025 | Fine | $24,115 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.80 | 3.45 | 3.95 | bottom 13% in Ohio; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.34 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 10% in Ohio; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.62 | 3.07 | 3.50 | bottom 20% in Ohio; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 37% in Ohio; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 63.6 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 14% in Ohio; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 70.8 | 43.9 | 42.9 | bottom 12% in Ohio; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.40, weekend 3.10.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for West Park Care Center LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Om Holdco 2 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/01/2022 |
| Optalis LP Investors 2 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 06/01/2022 |
| Optum Management Solutions. INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| SNW LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 06/01/2022 |
| Charles Franklin LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Charles Westland LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Forbright Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2026 |
| Hemant Shah 2018 Irrevocable Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Obs of Oh LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2026 |
| Om Holdco 2 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Optalis LP Investors 2 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Paar 108 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Pinal R. Patel 2017 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Aarna R. Patel | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Pinal R. Patel 2017 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Ansh R. Patel | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Pinal R. Patel 2020 Irrevocable Family Trust Uad 10-6-2020 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Rajan G Patel 2020 Irr Fam Tr Uad 12-3-2020 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Schlaupitz Madhavan | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Scott, Mary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2026 |
| SNW LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Optalis Health & Rehabilitation — 36 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 35 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embassy of Woodview | 0.0 mi | Columbus, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Columbus Healthcare Center | 2.3 mi | Columbus, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Monterey Care Center | 2.7 mi | Grove City, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Scioto Pointe | 2.9 mi | Columbus, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Columbus LLC | 3.5 mi | Columbus, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Laurels of West Columbus, the | 4.1 mi | Columbus, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| First Community Village Healthcare Ctr | 4.7 mi | Columbus, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ohio Living Westminster-Thurber | 4.8 mi | Columbus, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Capital City Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Ce | 4.8 mi | Columbus, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Scioto Rehabilitation & Care Center | 5.0 mi | Columbus, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Meadow Grove Transitional Care | 5.2 mi | Grove City, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Bella Terrace Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 6.6 mi | Columbus, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Franklin, OH — 57 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365799.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details