18591 Quarry Rd, Riverview, MI 48192 (opens Google Maps) · Wayne County · (734) 282-2100· 91 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 28, 2026 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 26, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 7, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint · F-0727 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint · F-0758 |
| Sep 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Sep 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jun 26, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Jun 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Jun 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint · F-0622 |
| Jun 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint · F-0758 |
| Jan 9, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Jan 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jan 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $4,194.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2023 | Fine | $4,194 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.59 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 14% in Michigan; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 16% in Michigan; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.99 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 7% in Michigan; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 16% in Michigan; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 60.7 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 66.7 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.51, weekend 3.25.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.91 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunn, Charles | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/01/2013 |
| Metro Man II INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/30/2006 |
| Atto, Ghassan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Atto, Ghassan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/27/2025 |
| Bright, Juliana | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Bright, Juliana | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/27/2025 |
| Brown, Tyree | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Conner, Marianne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2024 |
| Dunn, Charles | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2006 |
| Dunn, Charles | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2006 |
| Metro Man III LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2006 |
| Optum Management Solutions. INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2006 |
| Optum Management Solutions. INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/27/2025 |
| Patel, Rajan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Schlaupitz Madhavan | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Shah, Hemant | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2026 |
| Sharon, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2024 |
| Sharon, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2024 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Optalis Health & Rehabilitation — 36 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 35 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rivergate Health Care Center | 0.8 mi | Riverview, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Rivergate Terrace | 0.8 mi | Riverview, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Orchards at Southgate | 1.3 mi | Southgate, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Aerius Health Center | 1.9 mi | Riverview, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Applewood Nursing Center, INC | 4.3 mi | Woodhaven, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Lodge at Taylor | 4.6 mi | Taylor, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park | 4.8 mi | Allen Park, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Medilodge of Taylor | 4.8 mi | Taylor, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aberdeen Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center | 4.9 mi | Trenton, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Regency, a Villa Center | 5.1 mi | Taylor, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Riverside Commons Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC | 8.4 mi | Dearborn, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Imperial, a Villa Center | 8.8 mi | Dearborn Heights, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Wayne, MI — 63 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235376.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details