MichiganRiverview

Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

18591 Quarry Rd, Riverview, MI 48192 · Wayne County · 91 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1978

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$4,194
Fines, last 3 years
3.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 28, 2026 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 26, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 7, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 28, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 28, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 28, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 28, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Apr 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Aug 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 12, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 28, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 26, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024110F
202581G ▲
202671G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $4,194.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 17, 2023Fine$4,194

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.594.323.95bottom 14% in Michigan; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.470.840.69bottom 16% in Michigan; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.993.793.50bottom 7% in Michigan; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.490.48bottom 16% in Michigan; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.744.145.8bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)66.739.242.9bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 15% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.51, weekend 3.25. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Dunn, CharlesIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%12/01/2013
Metro Man II INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/30/2006
Atto, GhassanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Atto, GhassanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/27/2025
Bright, JulianaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Bright, JulianaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/27/2025
Brown, TyreeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Conner, MarianneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/13/2024
Dunn, CharlesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/30/2006
Dunn, CharlesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/30/2006
Metro Man III LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/30/2006
Optum Management Solutions. INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/30/2006
Optum Management Solutions. INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/27/2025
Patel, RajanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Schlaupitz MadhavanOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Shah, HemantIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2026
Sharon, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/13/2024
Sharon, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/13/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Rivergate Health Care Center0.8 miRiverview, MI★★★★☆4/5
Rivergate Terrace0.8 miRiverview, MI★★★☆☆3/5
The Orchards at Southgate1.3 miSouthgate, MI★★★★★4/5
Aerius Health Center1.9 miRiverview, MI★★★★★5/5
Applewood Nursing Center, INC4.3 miWoodhaven, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Lodge at Taylor4.6 miTaylor, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park4.8 miAllen Park, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Medilodge of Taylor4.8 miTaylor, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Aberdeen Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center4.9 miTrenton, MI★★☆☆☆3/5
Regency, a Villa Center5.1 miTaylor, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Riverside Commons Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC8.4 miDearborn, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Imperial, a Villa Center8.8 miDearborn Heights, MI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Riverview →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235376.