OhioColumbus

Willow Brook Christian Home

55 Lazelle Rd, Columbus, OH 43235 · Franklin County · 50 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Jan 16, 1995

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.28
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 2, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Dec 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Sep 2, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Feb 28, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 28, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 28, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 28, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 28, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Feb 28, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260F
2024120E
202531G ▲
202640F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.283.453.95top 10% in Ohio; top 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.460.600.69top 1% in Ohio; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.773.073.50top 10% in Ohio; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.890.420.48top 3% in Ohio; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.948.745.8top 24% in Ohio; top 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.343.942.9top 8% in Ohio; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.03, RN 1.37, weekend 3.54. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Barth, PhilIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2004
Davis, BrandiIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Harris, KentIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2025
Harris, KentIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2025
Irwin, TerryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Johnson, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/14/2019
Ketron, NicoleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Ketron, NicoleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2025
Longo, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2007
May, JerryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/24/2025
McKenna, BlytheIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
McKnight, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2023
McKnight, MatthewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2023
McKnight, MatthewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2023
Pickens, RogerIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2012
Poulson, ThomasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2010
Poulson, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2010
Richard, NeilIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2016
Ringle, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2025
Sarkel, EdIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Highbanks Care Center0.2 miColumbus, OH★★★★★4/5
Worthington Christian Village0.5 miColumbus, OH★★★★★3/5
Laurels of Norworth the2.3 miWorthington, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Laurels of Worthington, the2.9 miWorthington, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Capri Gardens3.6 miLewis Center, OH★★★★★4/5
Landings of Westerville Health and Rehab the3.9 miWesterville, OH★★★★★4/5
The Laurels of Walden Park4.3 miColumbus, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Buckeye Terrace Rehabilitation and Nursing Center4.4 miWesterville, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Wesley Glen Health Services Corp4.8 miColumbus, OH★★★★★5/5
Dublin Post Acute5.1 miDublin, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Columbus →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365988.