How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Village on the Green
500 Village Place, Longwood, FL 32779 (opens Google Maps) · Seminole County · (407) 682-0230· 60 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Nov 26, 1986 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 19, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Mar 12, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.92
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 12, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 12, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 8, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. F-0694
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
View all 10 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Jul 28, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 28, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jul 28, 2022 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.92
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.90
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.50
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.92 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 46% in Florida; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.90 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 26% in Florida; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.50 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 47% in Florida; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 25% in Florida; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.4 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 49% in Florida; top 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 44% in Florida; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 0.93, weekend 3.61.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.05 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Village on the Green. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lifespace Communities INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/1994 |
| Lifespace, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/09/2012 |
| Blackford, Gary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Darkey-Hrinya, Joyce | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/15/2018 |
| Dutra, Ana | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Fields, Venita | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/15/2018 |
| Galedacosta, Melissa | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/25/2017 |
| Gorman, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/26/2022 |
| Harshfield, Nicholas | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/09/2020 |
| Jantzen, Jesse | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2019 |
| Jensen, Claus | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/26/2023 |
| Kresse, Nikki | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/19/2021 |
| Lifespace Communities INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1994 |
| McDonough, Amy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/26/2023 |
| Pope, Erin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/25/2022 |
| Salamino, Jenifer | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/26/2023 |
| Sokeye, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Spangler, Patrick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Stretch, Clyde | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/26/2023 |
| Williams, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Lifespace Communities — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Waterford, the — Juno Beach, FL · overall 4/5
- Beacon Hill — Lombard, IL · overall 5/5
- Greenfields of Geneva — Geneva, IL · overall 5/5
- Oak Trace — Downers Grove, IL · overall 5/5
- Claridge Court — Prairie Village, KS · overall 5/5
- Friendship Village of Bloomington — Bloomington, MN · overall 4/5
- Friendship Village of South Hi — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 3/5
- Meadow Lake Health Center — Tyler, TX · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Florida midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 42% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 21 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 51 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Island Lake Center | 2.5 mi | Longwood, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Harborview Health Center West Altamonte | 2.7 mi | Altamonte Springs, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Forest Lake | 3.4 mi | Apopka, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Altamonte Springs | 3.7 mi | Altamonte Springs, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Longwood Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | Longwood, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ansley Cove Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 4.7 mi | Maitland, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Aviata at Lake Mary | 5.6 mi | Lake Mary, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rehabilitation Center of Winter Park | 6.1 mi | Maitland, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at Rosewood | 6.1 mi | Orlando, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Apopka | 6.1 mi | Apopka, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare College Park | 6.3 mi | Orlando, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mayflower Healthcare Center | 8.1 mi | Winter Park, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Seminole, FL — 10 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Healthcare and Rehab of Sanford — Sanford, FL · overall 3/5
- Legacy Pointe at Ucf — Oviedo, FL · overall 2/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105556.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).