How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1011 Mainland Center Dr, Texas City, TX 77591 (opens Google Maps) · Galveston County · (713) 358-0700· 134 certified beds · avg 103 residents/day · certified since May 30, 2014 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PUREHEALTH (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 25, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. F-0693
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jun 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 14, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Feb 14, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Feb 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.75 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 22% in Texas; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 25% in Texas; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.35 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 22% in Texas; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 17% in Texas; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 52.3 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 49% in Texas; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 64.7 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 34% in Texas; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.68, RN 0.50, weekend 3.30.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.68 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Shoal. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bellville Hospital District | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2022 |
| Armstrong, Robin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2014 |
| Armstrong, Robin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2014 |
| Campion, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Campion, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Cedillo, Olivia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Cedillo, Olivia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Dwight Mortgage Trust LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Fraser, Siobaughn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Fraser, Siobaughn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Smith, Lakesia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2019 |
| Smith, Lakesia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2019 |
| Thompson, Johnny | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| TX NM Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| TX NM Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2025 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Purehealth — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seabreeze Nursing and Rehabilitation | 0.4 mi | Texas City, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Lakes at Texas City | 1.1 mi | Texas City, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bayou Pines Care Center | 1.6 mi | La Marque, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Harbor Point Skilled Nursing | 3.5 mi | Texas City, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| The Phoenix Post-Acute | 5.2 mi | Texas City, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Heights of League City | 9.1 mi | League City, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Baywind Village Skilled Nursing & Rehab | 10.9 mi | League City, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| MRC the Crossings | 10.9 mi | League City, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Galveston Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 11.7 mi | Galveston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Regency Village | 12.8 mi | Webster, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Focused Care at Webster | 13.7 mi | Webster, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Meridian | 13.7 mi | Galveston, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Galveston, TX — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676360.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details