TexasLa Marque

Bayou Pines Care Center

4905 Fleming Street, La Marque, TX 77568 · Galveston County · 120 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Jul 2, 2009

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$14,069
Fines, last 3 years
2.96
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 16, 2025 · F-0755 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Why it matters: Weak pharmacy services lead to medication mistakes, delays, and missed drug interactions that can seriously harm residents.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 16, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Sep 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Apr 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202450E
202591J ▲
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,069.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 16, 2025Fine$14,069

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.963.463.95bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.300.440.69bottom 29% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.473.043.50bottom 13% in Texas; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.190.340.48bottom 18% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)68.155.345.8bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)63.654.642.9bottom 35% in Texas; bottom 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.03, RN 0.31, weekend 2.53. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Billy Schindele 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Clark, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Murrell, EdwardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Schindele, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Sherry Schindele Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Spangler, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
TDT Lamarque Opco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
TDT Lamarque Propco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Trident LTC, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Trident One Leasing LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Lakes at Texas City0.8 miTexas City, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
The Shoal1.6 miTexas City, TX★★★★★5/5
Seabreeze Nursing and Rehabilitation1.9 miTexas City, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Harbor Point Skilled Nursing5.2 miTexas City, TX★★★★☆5/5
The Phoenix Post-Acute6.8 miTexas City, TX★★★☆☆3/5
The Heights of League City8.6 miLeague City, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Baywind Village Skilled Nursing & Rehab10.8 miLeague City, TX★★★★★5/5
MRC the Crossings10.8 miLeague City, TX★★★★★5/5
Galveston Nursing and Rehabilitation Center12.2 miGalveston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Regency Village12.5 miWebster, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Focused Care at Webster13.4 miWebster, TX★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Laurel Court13.4 miAlvin, TX★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in La Marque →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676223.