TexasGalveston

The Meridian

2228 Seawall Blvd, Galveston, TX 77550 · Galveston County · 96 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Sep 22, 2010

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 7, 2022 · F-0690

The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 6, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Jul 7, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jul 7, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202241G ▲
202330E
202470D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.573.463.95top 7% in Texas; top 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.860.440.69top 5% in Texas; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.203.043.50top 6% in Texas; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.680.340.48top 5% in Texas; top 17% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.755.345.8bottom 48% in Texas; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.054.642.9bottom 42% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.47, RN 0.84, weekend 4.11. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Balentine, JayIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2010
Lozano, RamiroIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/24/2010
Balentine, JayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2010
Buelow, SeanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2024
Buelow, SeanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2025
Greene, SheritaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2021
Kaushik, VinodIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Kaushik, VinodIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2025
Lozano, RamiroIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/24/2010
Lozano, RamiroIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Galveston Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.7 miGalveston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
The Phoenix Post-Acute9.8 miTexas City, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Harbor Point Skilled Nursing11.5 miTexas City, TX★★★★☆5/5
The Shoal13.7 miTexas City, TX★★★★★5/5
Seabreeze Nursing and Rehabilitation13.8 miTexas City, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
The Lakes at Texas City14.7 miTexas City, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Bayou Pines Care Center14.8 miLa Marque, TX★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Galveston →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676260.