411 Alabama Ave, League City, TX 77573 (opens Google Maps) · Galveston County · (281) 332-9588· 107 certified beds · avg 90 residents/day · certified since May 24, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1 (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 16, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 24, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. F-0691
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Nov 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| May 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · F-0691 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| May 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint · F-0624 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint · F-0552 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint · F-0557 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,278.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2025 | Fine | $8,278 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.56 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 7% in Texas; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 3% in Texas; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.88 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 9% in Texas; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.71 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 4% in Texas; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 63.3 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 27% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 71.9 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 26% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.80, RN 0.98, weekend 4.08.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.80 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Baywind Village Skilled Nursing & Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barcelo, Bryce | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Barcelo, Bryce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Barcelo, Cecil | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Barcelo, Cecil | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Barcelo, Christopher | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Barcelo, Christopher | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Barcelo, Christopher | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Campbell, Frances | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Campbell, Frances | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Clark, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2024 |
| Kovar, Natasha | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Kovar, Natasha | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Lockhart, Christopher | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Newton, Elizabeth | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/22/2024 |
| Village Skilled Nursing & Rehab Care LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Waterford Partners LTD | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Waterford Partners LTD | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1 — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRC the Crossings | 0.2 mi | League City, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Regency Village | 2.4 mi | Webster, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Focused Care at Webster | 3.0 mi | Webster, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Heights of League City | 3.0 mi | League City, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Webster, LLC | 4.1 mi | Webster, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Friendship Haven Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cen | 6.7 mi | Friendswood, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Park Manor of South Belt | 8.7 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente | 8.8 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Suites Pasadena | 9.4 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sylan Shores Health and Wellness | 9.4 mi | La Porte, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Hca Houston Healthcare Southeast | 9.4 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente | 9.4 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Galveston, TX — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675323.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details