How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
The Pavilion at Stow for Nursing and Rehabilitatio
3700 Englewood Drive, Stow, OH 44224 (opens Google Maps) · Summit County · (330) 688-1828· 51 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Jan 10, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE PAVILION GROUP (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 21, 2023
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint F-0558
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint F-0812
View all 27 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated. · from a complaint · F-0807 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Apr 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Oct 14, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Oct 14, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Oct 14, 2021 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2021
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.99
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.63
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.78
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.99 | 3.45 | 3.95 | bottom 24% in Ohio; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 35% in Ohio; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.78 | 3.07 | 3.50 | bottom 35% in Ohio; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 44% in Ohio; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 72.1 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 5% in Ohio; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 73.3 | 43.9 | 42.9 | bottom 11% in Ohio; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.16, RN 0.67, weekend 2.93.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.16 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Pavilion at Stow for Nursing and Rehabilitatio. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acm Ashem Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 56% | 02/06/2025 |
| Evans, Tyler | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/06/2025 |
| Schonfeld, Simcha | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 23% | 02/06/2025 |
| Stow Group Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/06/2025 |
| Acm Ashem Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Birnbaum, Ezra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Dy, Jose | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Hirsch, Shaye | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Keller, Stephen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Keller, Stephen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Moerman, Rafael | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Moerman, Rafael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Moerman, Rafael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| NPNH1 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Schonfeld, Simcha | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| SHS Keren LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Stow Group Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Stow Property Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Stow Property Roll Up, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
| Stow Property, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2025 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Pavilion Group — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Pavilion at Jacksonville, the — Jacksonville, FL · overall 4/5
- The Pavilion at Crescent Lake — Crescent City, FL · overall 4/5
- The Pavilion at Kenton — Covington, KY · overall 1/5
- The Pavilion at Canal Fulton for Nursing and Rehab — Canal Fulton, OH · overall 2/5
- The Pavilion at Piketon — Piketon, OH · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you make sure residents — especially those who can't ask — get enough fluids throughout the day?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Ohio midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 72% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 20 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 73 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Altercare of Cuyahoga Falls Ctr for Rehab & Nursin | 2.0 mi | Cuyahoga Falls, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Arbors at Stow | 2.1 mi | Stow, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Hudson Springs Nursing and Rehab | 2.4 mi | Stow, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls | 2.7 mi | Cuyahoga Falls, OH | —/5 | SFF | |
| Falls Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation | 2.8 mi | Cuyahoga Falls, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Seasons Nursing and Rehab | 2.9 mi | Stow, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heather Knoll Retirement Village | 3.1 mi | Tallmadge, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Kent | 3.4 mi | Kent, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bath Creek Estates | 3.4 mi | Cuyahoga Falls, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wayside Farm INC | 3.7 mi | Peninsula, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tallmadge Health & Rehab Center | 3.7 mi | Tallmadge, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Heritage of Hudson | 4.7 mi | Hudson, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Summit, OH — 43 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- The Pinnacle Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Tallmadge, OH · overall 5/5
- Timberland Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation — Fairlawn, OH · overall 3/5
- Twinsburg Post Acute — Twinsburg, OH · overall 1/5
- Village at St Edward Nrsg Care — Fairlawn, OH · overall 4/5
- Wyant Woods Healthcare Center — Akron, OH · overall 2/5abuse
- Arbors at Fairlawn the — Fairlawn, OH · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365858.