How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
100 N Lake St, Crescent City, FL 32112 (opens Google Maps) · Putnam County · (386) 698-2222· 92 certified beds · avg 72 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE PAVILION GROUP (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Mar 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.57 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 14% in Florida; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 47% in Florida; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.17 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 13% in Florida; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 36% in Florida; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 27.9 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 18% in Florida; top 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 62.5 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 21% in Florida; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.54, weekend 3.25.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Pavilion at Crescent Lake. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birnbaum, Ezra | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Crescent City Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/03/2021 |
| FTK Capital LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2018 |
| Hirsch, Shaye | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Inzelbuch, Azriel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Moerman, Rafael | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| NPNH1 LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2018 |
| SHS Keren LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2018 |
| Singer, Simon | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Anderson, Raymond | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2023 |
| Anderson, Raymond | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2023 |
| Eldick, Moustafa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Fasten Halberstam LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2018 |
| Krieser, Akiva | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2018 |
| Moerman, Rafael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Pavilion Management Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2018 |
| Powerback Rehabilitation LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2018 |
| Richards Mitchell & Cross Pa | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2018 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Pavilion Group — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flagler Health and Rehabilitation Center | 15.5 mi | Bunnell, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Radiant Nursing and Rehab at Palatka | 17.5 mi | Palatka, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Palatka Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 18.7 mi | Palatka, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105808.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details