The Oaks at Battle Creek
706 North Avenue, Battle Creek, MI 49017 · Calhoun County · 77 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since Jun 10, 1986
Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (21)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 12, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Apr 18, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not inform residents of their visitation rights or did not treat all visitors equally. Residents have the right to receive the visitors they choose. · from a complaint |
| Jan 25, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 9).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.89 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 34% in Michigan; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.69 | top 31% in Michigan; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.67 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 44% in Michigan; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.82 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 11% in Michigan; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 23.1 | 44.1 | 45.8 | top 5% in Michigan; top 5% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 7.7 | 39.2 | 42.9 | top 4% in Michigan; top 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.17, RN 0.99, weekend 3.93. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental Merger Sub LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/01/2021 |
| Northstar Healthcare Income INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/01/2021 |
| Northstar Healthcare Income Operating Partnership LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/01/2021 |
| Trilogy Holdings Nt-Hci, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/01/2021 |
| Barney, Leigh | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2019 |
| Conner, Gregory | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2021 |
| Corbin, Kathy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/11/2011 |
| Davis, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/21/2017 |
| Fightmaster, Lisa | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Keybank National Association | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Mehaffey, Todd | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
| Pietrowski, Cristina | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
| Prosky, Danny | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Smith, Aubrey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2021 |
| Trilogy Management Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Willhite, Gabriel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/15/2023 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Majestic Care of Battle Creek | 0.2 mi | Battle Creek, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pinnacle Care of Battle Creek | 1.8 mi | Battle Creek, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| The Laurels of Bedford | 2.6 mi | Battle Creek, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Calhoun County Medical Care Facility | 3.6 mi | Battle Creek, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Evergreen Manor Senior Care Center | 4.5 mi | Battle Creek, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Marshall Nursing and Rehabilitation Community | 12.1 mi | Marshall, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Medilodge of Marshall | 13.0 mi | Marshall, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Laurels of Galesburg | 13.0 mi | Galesburg, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Villa at Borgess Place | 18.5 mi | Kalamazoo, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Thornapple Manor | 19.1 mi | Hastings, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Plainwell Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Communi | 19.4 mi | Plainwell, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Battle Creek →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235451.