MichiganBattle Creek

Evergreen Manor Senior Care Center

111 Evergreen, Battle Creek, MI 49015 · Calhoun County · 91 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS (20 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 2, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Dec 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Oct 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310E
202470D
202530D
202650F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.974.323.95bottom 41% in Michigan; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.710.840.69bottom 45% in Michigan; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.463.793.50bottom 38% in Michigan; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.490.48bottom 36% in Michigan; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.644.145.8bottom 42% in Michigan; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.139.242.9top 20% in Michigan; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.61, weekend 2.94. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Nexcare Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2013
Nexcare Health Systems, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2011
Perry, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2015
Sangster, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2013
Smith, CherylIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/07/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Laurels of Bedford2.7 miBattle Creek, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Majestic Care of Battle Creek4.3 miBattle Creek, MI★★★☆☆3/5
The Oaks at Battle Creek4.5 miBattle Creek, MI★★★★☆3/5
Pinnacle Care of Battle Creek5.7 miBattle Creek, MI★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Calhoun County Medical Care Facility7.1 miBattle Creek, MI★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
The Laurels of Galesburg8.6 miGalesburg, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Villa at Borgess Place14.2 miKalamazoo, MI★★☆☆☆1/5
Plainwell Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Communi15.8 miPlainwell, MI★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Marshall Nursing and Rehabilitation Community15.9 miMarshall, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Harold and Grace Upjohn Community Care Center16.1 miKalamazoo, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Medilodge of Marshall16.7 miMarshall, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Medilodge of Portage18.3 miPortage, MI★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Battle Creek →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235054.