MichiganBattle Creek

The Laurels of Bedford

270 N Bedford Road, Battle Creek, MI 49017 · Calhoun County · 123 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1976

Part of chain: CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE (81 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 12, 2026 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 10, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (40)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 12, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Jul 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jul 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023190F
202470F
2025100F
202641G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.514.323.95bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.720.840.69bottom 46% in Michigan; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.093.793.50bottom 11% in Michigan; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.490.48bottom 37% in Michigan; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.844.145.8top 34% in Michigan; top 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)38.939.242.9bottom 48% in Michigan; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.06, RN 0.63, weekend 2.70. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bedford Senior Leasing, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Ciena Healthcare Management INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Ciena Healthcare Management INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2025
Ciena Michigan Real Estate Group I, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/21/2025
Khan, AnisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Khan, AnisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Khan, AnisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Mason, BradIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2019
Mason, BradIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2019
Mohammad Qazi 2022 Children's Trust Uad 5-4-2022OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/21/2025
Qazi, MohammadIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Qazi, MohammadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Qazi, MohammadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Stobb, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Stobb, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Whitaker, CharlesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Whitaker, CharlesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Majestic Care of Battle Creek2.4 miBattle Creek, MI★★★☆☆3/5
The Oaks at Battle Creek2.6 miBattle Creek, MI★★★★☆3/5
Evergreen Manor Senior Care Center2.7 miBattle Creek, MI★★★★☆4/5
Pinnacle Care of Battle Creek4.2 miBattle Creek, MI★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Calhoun County Medical Care Facility6.0 miBattle Creek, MI★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
The Laurels of Galesburg10.8 miGalesburg, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Marshall Nursing and Rehabilitation Community14.7 miMarshall, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Medilodge of Marshall15.5 miMarshall, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Villa at Borgess Place16.1 miKalamazoo, MI★★☆☆☆1/5
Plainwell Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Communi16.8 miPlainwell, MI★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Harold and Grace Upjohn Community Care Center18.3 miKalamazoo, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Thornapple Manor18.4 miHastings, MI★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Battle Creek →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235299.