MichiganBattle Creek

Majestic Care of Battle Creek

200 E Roosevelt, Battle Creek, MI 49037 · Calhoun County · 65 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1968

Part of chain: MAJESTIC CARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.15
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (38)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Jan 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Oct 30, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Oct 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 17, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023140E
2024150F
202520D
202670E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.154.323.95bottom 2% in Michigan; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.840.69bottom 27% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.973.793.50bottom 6% in Michigan; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.430.490.48top 49% in Michigan; top 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)62.544.145.8bottom 8% in Michigan; bottom 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.039.242.9bottom 17% in Michigan; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.00, RN 0.55, weekend 2.83. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Dem Family Trust IOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest21%07/01/2021
Majestic Michigan Operations I LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2021
4 MDR of Queens INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Alexander, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Alexander, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Battle Creek SNF Realty LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Battle Creek SNF Realty LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Chamberlain, MargaretIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Chamberlain, MargaretIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Janas, AnthonyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Janas, AnthonyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Majestic Management Michigan LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Majestic Management Michigan LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2025
Marx, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Marx, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
MDG Majestic Michigan Realty I LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
MDG Real Estate Global LimitedOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Pruitt, PaulIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Pruitt, PaulIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Pruitt, PaulIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Oaks at Battle Creek0.2 miBattle Creek, MI★★★★☆3/5
Pinnacle Care of Battle Creek1.9 miBattle Creek, MI★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
The Laurels of Bedford2.4 miBattle Creek, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Calhoun County Medical Care Facility3.7 miBattle Creek, MI★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Evergreen Manor Senior Care Center4.3 miBattle Creek, MI★★★★☆4/5
Marshall Nursing and Rehabilitation Community12.3 miMarshall, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Laurels of Galesburg12.8 miGalesburg, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Medilodge of Marshall13.2 miMarshall, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Villa at Borgess Place18.3 miKalamazoo, MI★★☆☆☆1/5
Thornapple Manor19.2 miHastings, MI★★★★★4/5
Plainwell Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Communi19.2 miPlainwell, MI★★☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Battle Creek →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235023.