South CarolinaGreenville

The Gables of Pelham Skilled Nursing & Rehab

1306 Pelham Road, Greenville, SC 29615 · Greenville County · 45 certified beds · avg 32 residents/day · certified since Jul 5, 2000

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$11,196
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 10, 2025 · F-0605 · triggered by a complaint

The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.

Why it matters: Using sedating drugs as a 'chemical restraint' can rob residents of alertness and mobility and increases risks of falls and death, especially in people with dementia.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 10, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (10)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 24, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 10, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Jun 30, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jun 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jun 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230F
202572J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $11,196.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 10, 2025Fine$5,598
Feb 10, 2025Fine$5,598

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)0.004.083.95
Registered Nurse hours0.000.670.69
Weekend total nurse staffing0.003.553.50
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.000.410.48
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.145.945.8bottom 30% in South Carolina; bottom 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)80.042.142.9bottom 5% in South Carolina; bottom 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
FC Senior Living Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%04/01/2020
Foster Senior Living, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%04/01/2020
FSL Senior Living Ventures, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/17/2020
Foster, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2020
Foster, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
FSL Senior Living Ventures, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Willard, SusanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2020
Willard, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Patewood Post Acute1.2 miGreenville, SC★★★★☆3/5
NHC Healthcare - Greenville1.6 miGreer, SC★★★★★5/5
Linville Court at the Cascades Verdae2.1 miGreenville, SC★★★★★5/5
Promedica Skilled Nursing and Reh- Greenville West2.7 miGreenville, SC★★★★★4/5
Rolling Green Village2.8 miGreenville, SC★★★★★5/5
Southpointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation3.6 miGreenville, SC★★☆☆☆3/5
NHC Healthcare - Mauldin3.9 miGreenville, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Greenville Post Acute5.2 miGreenville, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Brushy Creek Post Acute5.8 miGreer, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Magnolia Manor - Greenville6.0 miGreenville, SC★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Greenville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425373.