How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
4000 Singing Hills Bvld, Dayton, OH 45414 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (937) 415-8000· 144 certified beds · avg 137 residents/day · certified since Sep 15, 2010 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARESPRING (16 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Aug 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578 |
| Mar 12, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 12, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · F-0624 |
| Mar 12, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 31, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 31, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2020 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.02 | 3.45 | 3.95 | bottom 27% in Ohio; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 40% in Ohio; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.78 | 3.07 | 3.50 | bottom 35% in Ohio; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 23% in Ohio; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 49.4 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 47% in Ohio; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.7 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 19% in Ohio; top 18% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.77, weekend 3.58.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.89 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Stonespring of Vandalia. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry N Bortz 06042009 Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 72% | 10/01/2013 |
| Bortz Family Irrevocable T/A | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 02/01/2014 |
| Carespring Health Care Holdings LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/01/2013 |
| Eppers, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 15% | 10/01/2013 |
| Carespring Health Care Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/23/2010 |
| Chirumbolo, Christopher | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2016 |
| Douglas, Jillian | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/12/2020 |
| Eppers, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2013 |
All 8 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carespring — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.4 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Siena Woods Care Center | 1.8 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aventura at Carriage Inn | 1.9 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maria Joseph Living Care Center | 3.6 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Arc at Trotwood LLC | 3.7 mi | Dayton, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Carecore at Mary Scott | 3.9 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Grafton Oaks Nursing Center | 4.0 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Gem City Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 4.0 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Trotwood Health & Rehab LLC | 4.1 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Laurels of Huber Heights the | 4.9 mi | Huber Heights, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Momentous Health at Vandalia | 5.0 mi | Vandalia, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Widows Home of Dayton | 5.0 mi | Dayton, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, OH — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366388.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details