Missouri ›Jefferson City

Stonebridge Oak Tree

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

3108 West Truman Boulevard, Jefferson City, MO 65109 (opens Google Maps) · Cole County · (573) 893-3063· 42 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Feb 29, 2008 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: STONEBRIDGE SENIOR LIVING (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 1, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 18, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.33
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 18, 2024 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689

  3. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 1, 2026F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 1, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Feb 28, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Feb 28, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814
Feb 28, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Apr 18, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Nov 22, 2023F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Nov 22, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Nov 22, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Nov 22, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Nov 22, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Nov 22, 2023C · Potential for minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583
Nov 22, 2023C · Potential for minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847
Sep 27, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 2).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380F
202411G ▲
202530F
202620F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.33
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.58
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.81
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.333.663.95top 22% in Missouri; top 28% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.490.69top 25% in Missouri; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.813.223.50top 23% in Missouri; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.330.48top 23% in Missouri; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.056.045.8top 42% in Missouri; bottom 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)—47.842.9—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.51, RN 0.61, weekend 3.97.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.51 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Stonebridge Oak Tree. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lierman, MarkIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2021
Bridge Rehabilitation INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Bridge Rehabilitation INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
Busey CorporationOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2023
Caywood, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1998
Caywood, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1998
Ciegel, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Ciegel, StevenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Doerhoff, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Doerhoff, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Eldercare Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2008
Eldercare Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2016
Knight, KaraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Knight, KaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Lierman Family Co VIII, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2008
Lierman, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Lierman, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Lierman, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Miller, BethIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/17/2023

Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Stonebridge Senior Living — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
  • "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 54% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
River City Living Community0.1 miJefferson City, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Heisinger Bluffs Healthcare Western Campus2.5 miJefferson City, MO★★★★★5/5
Jefferson City Manor Care Center2.8 miJefferson City, MO★☆☆☆☆3/5
Heisinger Bluffs Rehab and Healthcare Center2.8 miJefferson City, MO★★★★☆4/5
Stonebridge Villa Marie2.8 miJefferson City, MO★☆☆☆☆3/5
Capitol River Wellness & Rehabilitation3.1 miJefferson City, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Stonebridge Adams Street3.6 miJefferson City, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Stonebridge Westphalia16.5 miWestphalia, MO★★★☆☆3/5
California Care Center18.1 miCalifornia, MO★★★★★5/5
Riverview Nursing Center20.0 miMokane, MO★★★★☆5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Jefferson City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265819.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details